Browse
Search
Agenda 06-03-2025; 5-b - Application for Zoning Atlas Amendment – 9900 NC 57, Rougemont, Little River Township
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Agendas
>
Agendas
>
2025
>
Agenda - 06-03-2025 Business Meeting
>
Agenda 06-03-2025; 5-b - Application for Zoning Atlas Amendment – 9900 NC 57, Rougemont, Little River Township
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2025 1:32:46 PM
Creation date
5/29/2025 12:52:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/3/2025
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5-b
Document Relationships
Agenda for June 3, 2025 BOCC Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\BOCC Archives\Agendas\Agendas\2025\Agenda - 06-03-2025 Business Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
164
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
112 <br /> 166 Justin Chandler: Yes. <br /> 167 <br /> 168 Beth Bronson: So that land is already going to be disturbed? <br /> 169 <br /> 170 Justin Chandler: Yes. <br /> 171 <br /> 172 Beth Bronson: Okay. And then as far as the elevation change it didn't look super significant. Is there a place in <br /> 173 the report where you were talking about like the ease of grading? <br /> 174 <br /> 175 Justin Chandler: No, not in the report. Directly to the northeast of that parcel there, or actually on the 80-acre <br /> 176 parcel there's a house,too. So, the more you move it over the more it's sitting right in front of the <br /> 177 house. So,that's a factor of why it's placement to it as well. <br /> 178 <br /> 179 Beth Bronson: You're saying that the house is closer to the go-kart? <br /> 180 <br /> 181 Justin Chandler: Correct. Yeah. <br /> 182 <br /> 183 Ashley Moncado: You've gone too far down. I don't think we have an aerial, unfortunately. <br /> 184 <br /> 185 Beth Bronson: You can put it on Google Maps. It's no problem. <br /> 186 <br /> 187 Ashley Moncado: I think the house,you're probably going to say is about here? <br /> 188 <br /> 189 Justin Chandler: Yeah, a little to the south, right there. <br /> 190 <br /> 191 Beth Bronson: Yeah, so your problem is that it's in the dead middle of what, 80 acres? It's like in the almost the <br /> 192 middle? <br /> 193 <br /> 194 Justin Chandler: Approximately, yeah. <br /> 195 <br /> 196 Beth Bronson: Okay. And then the 11 acres, being south, right,and then northeast you're saying that it'll be too <br /> 197 close to the residence. <br /> 198 <br /> 199 Justin Chandler: Correct. <br /> 200 <br /> 201 Beth Bronson: Now, is this going to be a completely separated parcel? <br /> 202 <br /> 203 Justin Chandler: Correct. <br /> 204 <br /> 205 Beth Bronson: By the time this, pending approval, it would be its own parcel, but not just rezoned within the 80 <br /> 206 acres? <br /> 207 <br /> 208 Justin Chandler: Correct. <br /> 209 <br /> 210 Beth Bronson: Okay. <br /> 211 <br /> 212 Whitney Watson: I didn't think you understood the question. So,the parcel is going remain as a single parcel, <br /> 213 portion of it's going to be rezoned. Correct? <br /> 214 <br /> 215 Justin Chandler: Correct. It's a subdivision of the 80 acres. So, it will be 11.22 and then the remainder. <br /> 216 <br /> 217 Beth Bronson: I think that for condition Number 10,the property owner shall record a final plot dividing the 11.22- <br /> 218 acre parcel from the existing 80-acre park tract within 120 days of the commissioner's approval of <br /> 219 the rezoning application. So,that said,the facilities that would be on that property and used for <br /> 220 that property, utilities for that parcel would be completely separate from the other 80 acres? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.