Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-02-2004-9c
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2004
>
Agenda - 06-02-2004
>
Agenda - 06-02-2004-9c
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 8:09:39 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:42:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/2/2004
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
9c
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20040602
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
that mandatory water restrictions could be enacted when remaining storage is greater than the <br />trigger points proposed in the new ordinance should low storage levels exist early in the year. <br />Town staff has also indicated that the relaxed water use restrictions of the proposed revised <br />ordinance are to be considered a temporary measure that will have to be revisited as the <br />Town's normal water demand grows to more nearly match the water supply capacity of first the <br />current (Phase I iteration) capacity of the West Fork reservoir and then the expanded (Phase II <br />iteration) capacity. <br />The Town also recognizes that, as Orange County ordinances apply to approximately 50% of <br />Town utility customers, it is desirable for the County drought/water conservation ordinance to <br />track closely with its own ordinance. However, the Town's current request is only that the <br />BOCC review and comment on the provisions of the proposed Town drought/water <br />conservation ordinance,. <br />Insofar as the Town, the Town's utility customers and the County's goals and interests related <br />to water conservation issues is concerned, there are both positive and negative implications to <br />relaxing water use restrictions. A summary of those implications is outlined below: <br />® Eliminating utility revenue losses consequential to water conservation could allow <br />Hillsborough to reduce its rates by as much as 9% overall or by as much as 18% to out- <br />of-town customers only without offsetting rate increases to in-town customers. <br />® Eliminating stringent water conservation measures will address the issue of Town <br />customers who pay high rates to provide for what is now excess water supply while still <br />being subject to the inconveniences associated with restrictions on washing cars, <br />watering lawns, plants and so forth. <br />® Eliminating stringent water conservation measures and lowering water rates may make <br />the area more attractive for economic development opportunities that are currently <br />impacted by high rates and the prospect of water shortages. <br />® Water use/consumption strategies that do not encourage water conservation is contrary <br />to BOCC goals and values related to institutional and individual responsibility for <br />managing and using natural rescurces in a sustainable fashion. <br />® Water use/consumption strategies that do not encourage water conservation will allow an <br />accelerated drawdown of Lake Orange (to the maximum extent allowed by the Eno River <br />Capacity Use Agreement) which, in turn, negatively affects the aesthetic and recreational <br />values inherent in higher water levels at Lake Orange. <br />® Water use/consumption strategies that do not encourage water conservation will allow an <br />accelerated drawdown of Lake Orange (to the maximum extent allowed by the Eno River <br />Capacity Use Agreement) which, in turn, accelerates the reduction in the quantity of <br />release to maintain instream flow in the Eno River. <br />One of the stated values of the BOCC insofar as water conservation/drought ordinances are <br />concerned is a maximum level of continuity in the requirements, provisions, terminology, etc„ of <br />the ordinances applicable to the County's various utility providers (OWASA, Hillsborough, <br />Orange-Alamance).. That goal is proving to be difficult to accomplish given that each utility has <br />its distinct or unique characteristics in terms of customers, legislative powers, resources, values.. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.