Browse
Search
Minutes 03-06-2025-Business Meeting
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2020's
>
2025
>
Minutes 03-06-2025-Business Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/16/2025 3:01:48 PM
Creation date
4/16/2025 2:53:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/6/2025
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 03-06-2025; 12-1 - Information Item - February 25, 2025 BOCC Special Meeting Follow-up Actions List
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2025\Agenda - 03-06-2025 Business Meeting
Agenda - 03-06-2025; 12-2 - Information Item - Tax Collector’s Report - Numerical Analysis
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2025\Agenda - 03-06-2025 Business Meeting
Agenda - 03-06-2025; 12-3 - Information Item - Tax Collector’s Report - Measure of Enforced Collections
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2025\Agenda - 03-06-2025 Business Meeting
Agenda - 03-06-2025; 12-4 - Information Item - Tax Collector’s Report – Foreclosure Chart
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2025\Agenda - 03-06-2025 Business Meeting
Agenda - 03-06-2025; 12-5 - Information Item - Tax Assessor's Report - Releases Refunds under $100
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2025\Agenda - 03-06-2025 Business Meeting
Agenda - 03-06-2025; 4-a - Women’s History Month Proclamation
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2025\Agenda - 03-06-2025 Business Meeting
Agenda - 03-06-2025; 5-a - Continuation of Public Hearing – Applications for Zoning Atlas Amendment, Comprehensive Plan Amendments, & UDO Text Amendments to Realize “Fiddlehead Corner”, a Master Plan Development
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2025\Agenda - 03-06-2025 Business Meeting
Agenda - 03-06-2025; 8-b - Motor Vehicle Property Tax Releases Refunds
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2025\Agenda - 03-06-2025 Business Meeting
Agenda - 03-06-2025; 8-c - Property Tax Releases Refunds
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2025\Agenda - 03-06-2025 Business Meeting
Agenda - 03-06-2025; 8-d - Late Applications for Property Tax Exemption Exclusion
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2025\Agenda - 03-06-2025 Business Meeting
Agenda - 03-06-2025; 8-e - World Water Day Proclamation
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2025\Agenda - 03-06-2025 Business Meeting
Agenda - 03-06-2025; 8-f - Orange County Creek Week 2025 Proclamation
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2025\Agenda - 03-06-2025 Business Meeting
Agenda - 03-06-2025; 8-g - Contract Amendment with Farragut Systems, Inc. for Land Records Computer Assisted Mass Appraisal (LR CAMA) System Conversion Project
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2025\Agenda - 03-06-2025 Business Meeting
Agenda - 03-06-2025; 8-h - Sportsplex Indoor Swimming Pool HVAC Unit Replacement Contract Award and Approval of Budget Amendment #6-A
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2025\Agenda - 03-06-2025 Business Meeting
Agenda - 03-06-2025; 8-i - Administrative Correction to USDA Lease at Bonnie B. Davis Environmental and Agricultural Center
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2025\Agenda - 03-06-2025 Business Meeting
Agenda - 03-06-2025; 8-j - Award of Professional Services Agreement for County Grounds Maintenance
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2025\Agenda - 03-06-2025 Business Meeting
Agenda for March 6, 2025 BOCC Meeting
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2025\Agenda - 03-06-2025 Business Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
17 <br /> Edwin Cox said they put a pump down and run it for 24 hours and measure the water for <br /> the full 24 hours. He said it is measured by gallons per minute over the time to make sure it meets <br /> the requirements. He said it is monitored after the drawdown to see how quickly it recharges. <br /> Vice-Chair Hamilton said she wanted to start the deliberations. She said she appreciates <br /> this novel approach to providing housing for seniors. She said what concerns her is the purpose <br /> of the rural neighborhood activity node. She said she does not see this development as that. She <br /> said it is a residential community for a group of people and a family care home. She said it is not <br /> consistent with that node and allowing it would change the character of the area. She said it is <br /> hard to imagine it would be affordable given the cost of development. She said it would be <br /> appropriate for an area with water and sewer. She said it is important to support farmers in a rural <br /> environment and the current zoning does that. She said she does not see this development as <br /> consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. <br /> Chair Bedford said she thought it was great to have the month in between meetings to get <br /> additional information. She said the idea and concept of clustering houses is wise and will support <br /> that in the upcoming 2050 Plan. She said that failures are to be expected in any sewer system <br /> and those who use it have to pay for it so that isn't a concern for her. She said she appreciated <br /> learning more about the water supply, but it is not a concern for her either. She said the request <br /> to change the rural neighborhood activity node is not a good idea. She said she went out to the <br /> area and saw the variety of housing in the area. She said the Comprehensive Plan has worked <br /> to preserve the rural environment and cluster development has been in urban areas. She said <br /> she is going to vote to allow family care facilities but does not think that putting this project in that <br /> location is not a good fit and will not be supporting it. <br /> Commissioner McKee said the entire project hinges on changing the rural activity node. <br /> He said he has concern about expanding uses for these nodes outside of what was originally <br /> implied. <br /> Commissioner Carter said this Board has given a lot of thought to the work of the applicant <br /> and concerns of residents. She said it is important to set a direction and be consistent. She said <br /> she feels it would take away from consistency. She said that looking at the concerns brought up <br /> in the discussion, along with the use in the place where it is being proposed, she is not comfortable <br /> with voting yes to this project in this location. She said that she is in favor of clustered development <br /> in areas where it is allowed. <br /> Commissioner Fowler said there were a lot of desirable parts about this project and <br /> appreciates the applicant's willingness to propose conditions. <br /> Commissioner Greene said she responded to a request from neighbors to talk and hear <br /> their concerns. She said she met with Scott Radway on the site and contacted former <br /> commissioner Barry Jacobs and Roger Walden, a retired planner from Chapel Hill. She said both <br /> were around during the planning of the rural buffer and the water sewer planning framework. She <br /> said the notion of clustered subdivisions was in their minds at the beginning, but there was not <br /> the market demand or wherewithal to create the momentum for them. She said the notion that it <br /> disrupts farmland by placing cluster housing is not consistent with the plan that goes back to the <br /> 1980s. She said she appreciates the information about the wastewater. She said there have been <br /> concerns about lighting, but she does not think that it will be particularly disruptive because they <br /> will follow dark sky rules. She said it is hard to imagine it would be too noisy. She said she <br /> appreciated the letter from Sherry Roseman about the alignment with the Master Aging Plan. She <br /> said unless it was to be subsidized, it would not be affordable to most but would be less than <br /> "McMansions". She said she is not particularly troubled about the zoning issue and thinks there <br /> is support for the argument that additional residents would support commercial development in <br /> the node. She said with all that being said, she can't get past the amount of water that will be <br /> used. She said the impact this may have on residents in 30-50 years cannot be predicted. She <br /> said she does not want to run water and sewer lines all over southwestern Orange County. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.