Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
13 <br /> Similarly, the amendment of the text of the County's UDO [Attachments C1 —C5 (TXTA23-0001)] <br /> is required to ensure the conformance of the Zoning Atlas amendment with the UDO text. As <br /> discussed herein, the amendment to Section 3.8 is complementary with the proposed <br /> Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Atlas amendments, and the action should be consistent with <br /> those actions. The amendment to allow Family Care Facilities in the MPD-CD zoning district and <br /> update this land use definition in Article 10 is recommended by the Planning Director regardless <br /> of actions directly related to the other proposed amendments. <br /> Accordingly, the Planning Director recommends the following actions to the Board of County <br /> Commissioners, which features four (4) motions to be voted upon: <br /> 1) Continue the public hearing, receive public comments, and consider the Planning <br /> Board recommendations of denial on all three (3) applications; <br /> 2) Close the public hearing; <br /> 3) Consider and deliberate on the three (3) applications for action, with reference to the <br /> Staff Report on the zoning atlas amendment (Attachment A2), featuring analyses of <br /> UDO compliance, Comprehensive Plan Consistency, impact of the use to the <br /> surrounding area, and safety and efficiency of land use; <br /> 4) Vote to Approve the Staff-Recommended UDO Text Amendments to Section 5.2 <br /> and Article 10 (as reflected in the Statement of Consistency(Attachment C4)and UDO <br /> Text Amendment Ordinance (Attachment C5); <br /> 5) Vote on the Applicant-Initiated UDO Text Amendments to amend Section 3.8 <br /> (consistent with the Comprehensive Plan action, as reflected in the Statement of <br /> Consistency (Attachment C2) and UDO Text Amendments Ordinance (Attachment <br /> C3); <br /> 6) Vote to Approve or Deny the amendments to the Comprehensive Plan, as reflected <br /> in the attached Resolution of Approval (Attachment B7); and <br /> 7) Vote to Approve the Statement of Consistency (Attachment A7) and Zoning Atlas <br /> Amendment (Attachment A9) <br /> OR <br /> Vote to Deny the Zoning Atlas Amendment, including a statement as to why the <br /> application is not reasonable and/or not in the public interest, as detailed in the <br /> Statement of Inconsistency (Attachment A8). <br /> A motion was made by Commissioner McKee, seconded by Vice-Chair Hamilton to <br /> continue the public hearing from February 4, 2025. <br /> VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> Chair Bedford invited individuals that signed up to speak at the February 4, 2025 meeting <br /> but did not get a chance to speak to come forward to make comment. She indicated that only <br /> those individuals would be allowed to speak during this public hearing. <br /> No one who previously signed up to speak was present. <br /> Chair Bedford invited the applicant to come forward. <br /> LeAnn Brown provided clarification on some common questions about the project. She <br /> said they sent a letter to clarify, and she hopes that resolved a lot of them. She said they also <br /> addressed wastewater and said they have an expert in attendance if any further questions need <br /> to be addressed. She said clarified that this is not a commercial use but rather a residential use <br />