Browse
Search
OUTBoard Apr 21 2025
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange Unified Transportation Board
>
Agendas
>
2025
>
OUTBoard Apr 21 2025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 8:53:06 PM
Creation date
4/15/2025 8:50:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/21/2025
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
102
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
46 • The US 70 Improvements project should be revised from a widening with multimodal <br /> 47 accommodations to a modernization project with multimodal accommodations. <br /> 48 0 The NC 86 project should not be included in SPOT 8 at this time; instead, a comprehensive <br /> 49 multimodal corridor study should be conducted to identify appropriate improvements. <br /> 50 0 The NC 54 project should not be submitted for SPOT 8 consideration. <br /> 51 <br /> 52 Nish T. stated that he will present the Department, TAS, and OUTBoard recommendations to the Board <br /> 53 of County Commissioners at their April meeting and will forward the Board's decision to the appropriate <br /> 54 regional partners for further action. <br /> 55 <br /> 56 Motion:Joshua Mayo <br /> 57 Second: Sherry Apple <br /> 58 Unanimous <br /> 59 <br /> 60 b. Transportation DAC Memo V 2.5 <br /> 61 Nish T.presented the revised template and frameworkfor a multimodal assess memo to be used in future <br /> 62 development reviews.This tool: <br /> 63 9 Replaces traditional traffic impact analyses with comprehensive multimodal assessments. <br /> 64 9 Integrates data from crash records, travel demand models, census data, and local transportation <br /> 65 plans. <br /> 66 • Aims to improve developer accountability and coordinate improvements through DOT <br /> 67 encroachment agreements. <br /> 68 0 Staff may pursue adding a developer fee for these assessments in the future. <br /> 69 <br /> 70 Feedback&Discussion: <br /> 71 0 Members supported the approach and emphasized the importance of public transparency. <br /> 72 0 Suggestions included adding example test cases and clearly identifying threshold criteria. <br /> 73 0 Sherry Appel recommended ensuring the analysis documents be publicly accessible and advised on <br /> 74 setting developer fees realistically. <br /> 75 <br /> 76 Outcome: deferred until the April meeting when updated examples will be presented. <br /> 77 <br /> 78 AGENDA ITEM 6. STAFF REPORT/UPDATES <br /> 79 a. MPO, RPO, and NCDOT <br /> 80 Nish provided updates on key projects. Draft STIP and TIP documents indicate increased project costs; <br /> 81 updated lists were shared for review.A request was made to include the correct name for CW Stanford Middle <br /> 82 School, now renamed to Orange Middle School. Request made for an update on the community engagement <br /> 83 process for the Bike & Pedestrian Plan to be included on the next agenda. Several board members noted <br /> 84 concern over federal funding uncertainty—suggested inviting DOT or MPO staff to speak on the issue at a <br /> 85 future meeting. <br /> 86 <br /> 87 AGENDA ITEM 8:ADJOURNMENT <br /> 88 OUTBoard meeting was adjourned.The next meeting is scheduled for April 21 st, 2025. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.