Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-15-2025; 8-a - Minutes
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2020's
>
2025
>
Agenda - 04-15-2025 Business Meeting
>
Agenda - 04-15-2025; 8-a - Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/10/2025 3:36:44 PM
Creation date
4/10/2025 3:12:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/15/2025
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
8-a
Document Relationships
Agenda for April 15, 2025 BOCC Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2025\Agenda - 04-15-2025 Business Meeting
Minutes 04-15-2025-Business Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2020's\2025
ORD-2025-010-Fiscal Year 2024-25 Budget Amendment #8
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2020-2029\2025
ORD-2025-011-Approval of a Contract with Gilbane for Construction Manager-At-Risk Services for the Crisis Diversion Facility and Approval of Budget Amendment #8-A
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2020-2029\2025
OTHER-2025-024-Purchase of Property for the Crisis Diversion Facility
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2020 - 2029\2025
OTHER-2025-025-CMAR Contact
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2020 - 2029\2025
OTHER-2025-026-Application for North Carolina Education Lottery Proceeds for Orange County Schools (OCS) to Drawdown Funds from the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2020 - 2029\2025
OTHER-2025-028-Schools Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance (SAPFO) – Receipt and Transmittal Schools (OCS) to Drawdown Funds from the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2020 - 2029\2025
PRO-2025-013-Public Safety Telecommunicators Week Proclamation
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Proclamations\2020-2029\2025
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
15 <br /> 1 Commissioner Carter said Commissioners are using 2030 Plan to make their decision, but <br /> 2 she understands there is another plan being developed currently for future planning decisions. <br /> 3 She said as she looks at the current 2050 Comprehensive Plan, there are goals speaking to future <br /> 4 developments that would support businesses and are built in an environmentally conscientious <br /> 5 way. She said as they consider what is on its face, a very worthy project, they must use very <br /> 6 specific goals that will guide the Board in decision making. She highlighted the need for water and <br /> 7 sewer infrastructure in the 2050 plan. <br /> 8 Scott Radway agreed there is a great challenge to provide housing opportunities in a good <br /> 9 fashion that lives up to environmental, social, and other goals. He said the other layer is how to <br /> 10 do that in the current infrastructure or the infrastructure you can reasonably expect to have in the <br /> 11 future. He said the county has had real problems with water and sewer. He said there are things <br /> 12 that really fit together but infrastructure for safe wells and wastewater includes what you are <br /> 13 allowed to do with engineered wastewater systems and how they can reach a higher level of <br /> 14 treatment of that. He said he thinks they have provided that information. He said the question is <br /> 15 whether the Board is willing to let what is allowed happen and with a large amount of safety. He <br /> 16 said the applicant has greatly reviewed the water and soils for wastewater and they feel they have <br /> 17 addressed the need. He said that they will abide by the higher impervious surface standards of <br /> 18 neighboring nodes. He suggested those standards be put into this district and to other nodes as <br /> 19 well. <br /> 20 Vice-Chair Hamilton said there seemed to be back and forth on whether this would be a <br /> 21 55+ community in earlier stages of the process. <br /> 22 Chair Bedford said the Board received an email on that this afternoon. <br /> 23 LeAnn Brown said the intention is for this to be a 55+ community and meet all the <br /> 24 necessary federal requirements. She said there is question from a county perspective, and it is <br /> 25 up to the Board if they would like to make that a condition. She said that if it becomes enforceable, <br /> 26 it would be enforced by the county zoning administrator. She said whether it is a condition or not, <br /> 27 that is the plan. She said they are in agreement if the Board wants to include the condition. <br /> 28 Commissioner Fowler asked if there is a limit to percentage of land that can be <br /> 29 development. <br /> 30 Cy Stober said the activity nodes have a threshold for non-residential uses, but the zoning <br /> 31 ordinance does not address conditional zoning districts. He said non-residential uses could be <br /> 32 allowed with conditional zoning districts. He said that for conventional zoning districts, there are <br /> 33 different thresholds. He said there is available balance for commercial development in this node <br /> 34 and this would not take away from the ability to put commercial uses in the node. <br /> 35 Commissioner Fowler asked if the applicant would be willing to have a condition about <br /> 36 addressing any remediation for neighboring wells that may be impacted. <br /> 37 LeAnn Brown said the applicant has tried to address this issue, but Orange County has <br /> 38 not dealt with de-watering and there are no standards. She said that their research discovered <br /> 39 that there was a concern about neighboring well issues in Wake County and Wake County <br /> 40 investigated a program in place that has not been used for 15 years. She said they do not know <br /> 41 what a condition like that would look like because a well can run dry for other reasons. She said <br /> 42 they would have to determine if the wells are drawing from the same aquafer. She said the rules <br /> 43 in bringing the well up would include determination of the aquafer it is tapped into and if the use <br /> 44 is affecting other wells. She said if they were to affect someone's well, that would be one thing <br /> 45 but if people had problems with wells otherwise, it is a different situation. She said that Wake <br /> 46 County has 600 community wells, and they have not dealt with a dewatering program. She said <br /> 47 she is unsure how to write the condition. She said the applicant would consider such a condition <br /> 48 if it did not require the applicant to pay to research the cause of the neighboring well issues. <br /> 49 Commissioner McKee said he is more concerned about wastewater treatment systems. <br /> 50 He said that he knows they are relatively safe and reliable. He asked if the applicant be willing to <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.