Browse
Search
PB Agenda Packet - April 9 2025
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Agendas
>
2025
>
PB Agenda Packet - April 9 2025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/2/2025 3:41:57 PM
Creation date
4/2/2025 3:38:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/9/2025
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
271
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
− This 38-lot development is expected to generate less than 30 trips per peak <br />hour. Based on our findings, no roadway improvements are expected from <br />NCDOT. Other jurisdictions may have tother requirements. <br />Applicant Response: Noted, thank you. <br /> <br />3. Plans: − Redlined plans with more details are being offered. See attached. Prior to <br />issuance of the above permit documents, and addition to the state <br />maintenance system, the applicant will need to satisfactorily address the <br />comments on the plans as well as the following highlights: <br />Applicant Response: Noted, thank you. − With the intention of the roads being added to the state highway <br />maintenance system, the subdivision will need to be designed to the <br />standards found in NCDOT’s Subdivision Roads Minimum Construction <br />Standard and to NCDOT road addition requirements. <br /> Applicant Response: Noted, thank you. − Road addition following the proposed phasing would prohibit addition of <br />roads. <br />Applicant Response: No petition for State road maintenance will be made until roads <br />are constructed to NCDOT standards and there are sufficient houses on the road <br />to meet NCDOT standards. − The division of phase 1A and 1B would prohibit the addition of “Eden View <br />Way”. <br />Applicant Response: No petition for State road maintenance will be made until roads <br />are constructed to NCDOT standards and there are sufficient houses on the road <br />to meet NCDOT standards. − Phase 1A as proposed has to few houses for the road to be considered for <br />addition to state maintenance. <br />Applicant Response: No petition for State road maintenance will be made until the <br />minimum number of houses are constructed. − The Division of Phase 1B and 2 would prohibit the addition of “Bildan Way”. <br />Applicant Response: No petition for State road maintenance will be made until roads <br />are constructed to NCDOT standards and there are sufficient houses on the road <br />to meet NCDOT standards. − Phase 1B as proposed has to few housed on “Bildan Way” for the road to <br />be. <br />Applicant Response: No petition for State road maintenance will be made until the <br />minimum number of houses are constructed. − If the Phases are intended to be built as proposed, turnarounds will need to <br />be designed for the end of the roads of each phase until full build out <br />Applicant Response: Turnarounds have been indicated on the revised plat and <br />labeled with the note “Turnaround design and associated ROW geometry will be <br />determined on final plat, pending County and NCDOT approval.” − The attached memo "Secondary Road Turnaround Policy" gives NCDOT <br />policy on turnarounds and cul-de-sacs. <br />Applicant Response: Discussions between Orange County and NCDOT about the <br />turnarounds are ongoing. Per direction from Orange County Planning, note <br />247
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.