Browse
Search
PB Agenda Packet - April 9 2025
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Agendas
>
2025
>
PB Agenda Packet - April 9 2025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/2/2025 3:41:57 PM
Creation date
4/2/2025 3:38:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/9/2025
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
271
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> 6 <br />SSURGO database7 supplied with the SWAT model as assigned to areas defined by the NRCS soil series <br />units8 that cover the model area. Vegetative cover used to compute ET within the SWAT model was <br />defined by the USGS land cover database9. <br /> <br />Climatic data for the SWAT model was used for the 4 km x 4 km grid cell of the national PRISM <br />database10 centered on the property and comprised daily values of precipitation, and minimum and <br />maximum daily temperature for the 42 year period from January 1, 1982, to December 31, 2023. Figure <br />6 shows the distribution of annual precipitation and groundwater recharge computed with the SWAT <br />model. Mean annual precipitation is 47.06 inches and mean annual recharge is 12.06 inches. Figure 6 <br />shows the annual distribution of recharge and the values for 1983 through 2023. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Figure 6.-- Annual distribution and annual recharge computed with the SWAT model. <br />The steady state watertable elevations shown in Figure 5 were computed using the mean annual recharge. <br /> <br />To assess the values of hydraulic conductivity used for the model it was run with both wells pumping at <br />an average of 25 gallons/minute. This assessment required a slight reduction of the hydraulic conductivity <br />of the bedrock to 0.25 ft/day from the initial estimated value of 0.33 in Table 3 to reasonably reproduce <br />the reported drawdowns in the wells when pumping. Figure 7 shows the computed steady state water <br />drawdown with both wells pumping. The average of the modeled drawdown in the wells is 87 feet which <br />is close to the reported values shown in Table 3 of 90 feet <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />7 https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/resources/data-and-reports/soil-survey-geographic-database-ssurgo <br />8 https://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx <br />9 https://www.usgs.gov/node/279743 <br />10 https://prism.oregonstate.edu/ <br />126
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.