Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-24-2004-D.1
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2004
>
Agenda - 05-24-2004
>
Agenda - 05-24-2004-D.1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 8:23:48 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:42:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/24/2004
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
d1
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20040524
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2004
ORD-2004-019 - Zoning Ordinance Amendment Wireless Element of the Master Telecommunication Plan
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2000-2009\2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
200 <br />the 10-15 property owners.. There would be notification of everyone within 500 feet of <br />the property. They would like to proceed in the first quarter of 2003., <br />Commissioner Gordon asked for Craig Benedict to list ttre sites again. There <br />are two sites on the Walters' property that are voluntary ag sites, Lee Miller is another <br />voluntary ag site.. Orange County has some possible sites - NC 86 (possible Public <br />Works site), Lake Orange. UWASA has some sites outside of the critical area, White <br />Cross Fire Station is a possibility as well as Oak Grove Baptist Church. The property <br />owners need to sign a document saying that they are definitely interested in being a part <br />of the MTP program. <br />Commissioner Gordon asked if preference would be given to a voluntary ag <br />site. <br />Commissioner Carey asked about properly beside a County site and a <br />conflict of interest. Craig Benedict said that they could not push preferences for any <br />sites.. He said that the process that the County will go through to offer the land for <br />telecommunication purposes will be the same process that a private entity can use. <br />Chair Jacobs asked about how to advertise that these opportunities are <br />available.. He asked how we would let people in the agricultural community know that <br />this is a possibility. Craig Benedict said that if someone wants to enter the voluntary ag <br />system in the coming year, the MTP can be adjusted to add their property. This <br />incentive can be sent to the Ag Preservation Board and ERCD. He said that they also <br />sent notices out to all of the fire stations. <br />John Link said that as the staff is notifying joint owners, they will share the <br />information with the Planning Board and the Board of County Commissioners first prior <br />to sending it out. <br />Chair Jacobs asked about hiring a consultant to refine this plan. He asked if <br />that would be part of a subsequent process or this process. Craig Benedict said that <br />they need a consultant to respond to the applications that come forward, The fee <br />structure in the amendments will pay for the consultants. When the consultant is hired, <br />they can be used to refine the MTP. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Brown, seconded by Commissioner <br />Halkiotis to accept the Administration's recommendation to approve the pursuit of <br />finalization of the Master Telecommunications Plan and to direct staff to prepare the <br />Plan for formal adoption through the public hearing process and to bring back in the first <br />quarter of 2003. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />c. Amend Article 6.29.3 to create a Secondary Development Area south of <br />i-85 in the I-85/Buckhorn Road Economic Development District (EDD). <br />Craig Benedict said that the entire EDD was considered a primary <br />development area (retail, industrial, manufacturing, etc.). The suggested change in the <br />secondary development area would allow for some banking and institutional uses and <br />also some residential uses. The residential uses would be multi-family and not single- <br />farnilydetached. The suggestion is that animal houses and kennels, construction, and <br />manufacturing would not be allowed in the secondary development area,. <br />Commissioner Gordon asked about the impetus for bringing this forward at <br />this time. She thinks that this is the most appropriate place for this type of development <br />and not secondary development. <br />Craig Benedict said that there has not been any activity in the non-residential <br />sector in this sector at all, If there can be a lead use to spur infrastructure, it might open <br />up the entire area that could lead to a water and sewer system. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.