|
19
<br /> 1 Slide #19
<br /> 2024-25 OCPEH BUDGET CH OC CARR. HILLS,
<br /> 39,70% 39,50% 14.30% 6.50%
<br /> Staff/Description Total PORTION PORTION PORTION PORTION
<br /> OCP@H Expansion Budget
<br /> 2.625 FTE:1 Homeless Programs Manager,
<br /> CoCPersonnei.625 Homeless PrcgramsCoordinator&1
<br /> Housing Access Coordinator $241,173 $ 95,746 $ 95,263 $ 34,488 $ 15,676
<br /> CoC Operations $ 82,460 $ 32,737 $ 32,572 $ 11,792 $ 5,360
<br /> SOHRAO Personnel4.0 FTE:1 Clinical Coordinator(CJRD),3 Peer
<br /> Street Navigator(OCPEH) $285,516 $ 113,350 $ 112,779 $ 40,829 $ 18,559
<br /> SOHRAD Operations $ 37,050 $ 14,709 $ 14,635 $ 5,298 $ 2,408
<br /> RRHPersonnel0.5 FTE $ 33,500 $ 13,300 $ 13,233 $ 4,791 $ 2,178
<br /> RRH Operations $ 3,415 $ 1,356 $ 1,349 $ 488 $ 222
<br /> 2/3 of annual operational costs(OCPEH is
<br /> Bridge Housing Operations requesting funding for four of the six beds
<br /> available.The two remaining beds will be
<br /> funded with support from UNC Health) $ 147,887 $ 58,711 $ 58,415 $ 21,148 $ 9,613
<br /> Coordinated EntryPersonnefO.5 FTE $ 34,195 $ 13,575 $ 13,507 $ 4,890 $ 2,223
<br /> Coordinated Entry Operations $ 3,415 $ 1,356 $ 1,349 $ 488 $ 222
<br /> FY23-24 Fund Balance$70,000 was approved to carry over from
<br /> FY22-23 to apply in FY24-25 $(70,000) $ (27,790) $ (27,650)1$ (10,010) $ (4,550)
<br /> TOTAL EXPANSlONBUDGET $798,611 $ 317,048 $ 315,4511$ 114,201 $ 51,910
<br /> 2024-25 01 BUDGET $1,893,545.00
<br /> Joint Funding("Expansion Budget") $798,611.00 �I COUNTY AI
<br /> County Funding("Local Investments") $309,294.13D '� �RAN GE CDU NTY
<br /> Federal Grants("DCPEH Grants") $785,640.00
<br /> Q HOUSING DEPARTMENT
<br /> 2
<br /> 3 Chair Bedford noted that there was a typo on slide#19, and the first personnel line should
<br /> 4 say 1.625 FTE" because they removed the Housing Access Coordinator. She asked what
<br /> 5 happened to the Rapid Rehousing Position.
<br /> 6 Blake Rosser said there was a fair amount of confusion about the programming and the
<br /> 7 position. He said he had mentioned this back in September, but they had issues with the funding
<br /> 8 for rapid rehousing. He said the rental assistance program they were counting on HOME funding,
<br /> 9 but the director had not seen the application for the HOME funding. He said they were paying out,
<br /> 10 but they did not have income. He said they lost one manager, and they repurposed her salary.
<br /> 11 He said that since then, they have developed a leaner rapid rehousing program, with only two
<br /> 12 case managers. He said one is paid for by the county and included in the personnel and one is
<br /> 13 paid for by HUD grants.
<br /> 14 Chair Bedford asked where it is on the chart.
<br /> 15 Blake Rosser said the HUD is not on the chart because it remained largely unchanged.
<br /> 16 He said that you can see the two rapid rehousing case managers become one and the rent of the
<br /> 17 funding is used for rental assistance.
<br /> 18 Chair Bedford asked if Chapel Hill provided their full share.
<br /> 19 Blake Rosser said they signaled an intention to, and the county is about to invoice them.
<br /> 20 Chair Bedford said up until 2019, the only jointly funded positions were the coordinator
<br /> 21 and the assistant. She said in 2019, the Continuum of Care funded positions to do the work. She
<br /> 22 said it got confusing with the funding sources because there were ARPA and COVID CARE
<br /> 23 dollars. She said SORAD was going into the budget at the same time and the joint funding became
<br />
|