Browse
Search
PB Agenda Packet - Feb 5 2025
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Agendas
>
2025
>
PB Agenda Packet - Feb 5 2025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/3/2025 4:14:08 PM
Creation date
2/3/2025 4:13:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/5/2025
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
22 <br /> DRAFT <br /> 819 had to buy a place down off South Miami because she couldn't afford even the dumpiest place in <br /> 820 Hillsborough because it was out of reach. So, if we're going to go that route,we're just going to <br /> 821 keep pushing people out and it's only going to be the rich that can be in this County,so I really <br /> 822 don't know how we can have those types of things without having some real thought. I live north of <br /> 823 70. There's nothing for me. I go to Mebane to shop. I would prefer to put my money here in town <br /> 824 but there's nothing for me in this town to shop. I have to go somewhere else to do that. I would <br /> 825 love to have more options north of town where a lot of us out there on the rural area have to drive, <br /> 826 1 drive at least 20 minutes to get to town to do something. So which way am I going? The one <br /> 827 that has more choices. And that's just the way it is. So, if Orange County wants the rural,they're <br /> 828 going to have to think about that. Peel off those warehouses and start thinking about something <br /> 829 that the rest of us can actually shop at and buy. Because I don't go to Family Dollar or Dollar <br /> 830 Trees for my groceries, so Food Lion is it in this town. Food Lion is it up this way and it's just not <br /> 831 enough. There are not enough choices for us up this way. And everybody down south in Chapel <br /> 832 Hill and Carrboro are happy because you can't beat enough choices off between everything that's <br /> 833 around them. So as far as they're concerned, County's waiting. The rest of us up in north,there's <br /> 834 plenty of people that up north that don't want growth. I'm with them, but I need some choices <br /> 835 closer to me because the mileage that I'm tacking on my vehicle just to go get groceries,we need <br /> 836 to think about that. And that's something that, if you're not going to expand water and sewer, it's <br /> 837 never going to be affordable. That's just the bottom line. The taxpayer's going to pay for it one <br /> 838 way or the other. You're either going to pay for the water and sewers to be built out or all of us <br /> 839 lower income folks are going to get pushed out and it's only going to be the folks that can afford <br /> 840 the million dollar plus properties. I mean I'd love to know where the commissioner's mind was at, 1 <br /> 841 don't understand. At one point, if I'm not mistaken, I thought I heard that potentially eliminating or <br /> 842 reducing the rural buffer was supposed to on the table as far as a choice for people to talk about. <br /> 843 Did that get any attraction? <br /> 844 <br /> 845 Leigh Anne King: So,that was some of what we tested. Well,we tested some, like I was saying,the Blackwood <br /> 846 Station area in particular was an area that was a focus both for rural conservation neighborhood <br /> 847 and also for the mixed-use center development. And I think, because there has been such strong <br /> 848 support for, and if you look at that kind of percentages of people in terms of the alternatives they <br /> 849 were supporting, if I remember correctly, I'll just go back. I'm double checking myself and not <br /> 850 saying something incorrectly here. So Alternative No. 1 had 58 percent. So that's current policy. <br /> 851 54 for Alternative No. 2, environmental agricultural watershed protection and then 52 percent for <br /> 852 rural conversation neighborhoods,which is No. 3. And then kind of, there's a split a little bit in <br /> 853 terms of some of the development mix for No.4. So,the high end, if you were going to compare <br /> 854 them across,there's actually more support for what we do today. But there's also this expression <br /> 855 that we need to be doing more than what we're doing today with respect to how we're offering <br /> 856 housing options within our community and making things more attainable for folks. I think the real <br /> 857 challenge, the real rub, is there is such strong support for environmental protection, agricultural <br /> 858 preservation, and watershed protection. And when you start putting lot of pipes in the ground to <br /> 859 serve different areas, are you going to be able to afford that infrastructure. There will be <br /> 860 development that will go along with it. And I think that there doesn't seem to be a lot of strong <br /> 861 support for changing in a major way the land planning in the unincorporated areas. <br /> 862 <br /> 863 Adam Beeman: But cost was never brought up and this is just merely what do you think versus do you understand <br /> 864 that based on the approach that you're taking,you are going to significantly drive the cost up. 1 <br /> 865 think a lot of people don't realize that the County's budget isn't going to stay static. The folks that <br /> 866 work for the County expect pay raises whether they're 1 percent, 2 percent, 3 percent or whatever <br /> 867 they may be. So that means that costs are going to go up every single year. And if the only <br /> 868 people that are footing the bills are taxpayers, that means we're going to continue to climb and <br /> 869 climb and climb. So that's the rub that people don't take into consideration.The ramifications of <br /> 870 maintaining what we have. Because once we close off, now we have prime land. Everything else <br /> 871 around us had been developed. There's no more developable land down the road. And we have <br /> 872 all this available land. What do you think is going to happen with those conservations. They're <br /> 873 going to figure out how to peel that conservation back and develop the heck out of that land <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.