Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-04-2025; 5-a - Applications for Zoning Atlas Amendment, Comprehensive Plan Amendments, & UDO Text Amendments to Realize “Fiddlehead Corner”, a Master Plan Development – Conditional District
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2020's
>
2025
>
Agenda - 02-04-2025 Business Meeting
>
Agenda - 02-04-2025; 5-a - Applications for Zoning Atlas Amendment, Comprehensive Plan Amendments, & UDO Text Amendments to Realize “Fiddlehead Corner”, a Master Plan Development – Conditional District
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/30/2025 1:32:28 PM
Creation date
1/30/2025 1:34:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/4/2025
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5-a
Document Relationships
Agenda for February 4, 2025 BOCC Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2025\Agenda - 02-04-2025 Business Meeting
Minutes 02-04-2025-Business Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2020's\2025
ORD-2025-005-An Ordinance Amending the UDO of Orange County
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2020-2029\2025
OTHER-2025-005-Acceptance of the Agricultural Growth Zone Grant with the North Carolina Department of Agriculture
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2020 - 2029\2025
OTHER-2025-006-CHCCS & OCS Schools Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance Approval of Membership and Capacity Numbers
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2020 - 2029\2025
OTHER-2025-007-OCS-SAPFO- Schools Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance -Approval of Membership and Capacity Numbers
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2020 - 2029\2025
OTHER-2025-015-Statement of Consistency of a Proposed UDO Text Amendment with Adopted Orange County Plans
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2020 - 2029\2025
OTHER-2025-016-Statement of Inconsistency of a Proposed Zoning Atlas Map Amendment with the Adopted Orange County 2030 Comprehensive Plan and Other ApplicableAdopted Plans
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2020 - 2029\2025
PRO-2025-001-Black History Month Proclamation
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Proclamations\2020-2029\2025
RES-2025-010-Motor Vehicle Property Tax Release Refund
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2020-2029\2025
RES-2025-011-Late Applications for Property Tax Exemption Exclusion
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2020-2029\2025
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
361
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
337 <br /> developments that promote economical and efficient land use, improved level of amenities, <br /> appropriate and harmonious variety, creative design, and a better environment through the approval of <br /> a general concept Master Plan the [sic] permits defined flexibility to accommodate land use <br /> adjustments in response to evolving market trends." <br /> The community to be developed by Hands Four Development Cooperative is a model of creative <br /> design to accomplish the purpose stated in the UDO: economical and efficient land use with a high <br /> level of amenities that simultaneously protects the environment. <br /> In the matrix of Appendix F in the Comprehensive Plan, Rural Community Activity Node (RCAN) is <br /> linked with four types of Conditional Districts: ASE-CD, MPD-CD, R-CD and NR-CD. Rural <br /> Neighborhood Activity Node (RNAN) is linked with three of these (ASE-CD, R-CD, and NR-CD) but <br /> not with MPD-CD. <br /> We are not aware of a reason for omission of a linkage between RNAN and MPD-CD. Perhaps it was <br /> an oversight rather than a specific choice. Notwithstanding, it is relevant to notice that MPD-CD <br /> Development Standards in the UDO appear to allow the County at least as much discretion to control <br /> the characteristics of a development as do the other three Conditional Districts. In fact, 52 permitted <br /> uses in Table 5.2 of the UDO are allowed in R-CD or NR-CD but not in MPD-CD. Only one use is <br /> permitted in MPD-CD that is not allowed in the other Conditional Districts. <br /> The Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan reflects a delicate balance involving the interplay <br /> of a disparate set of objectives to be simultaneously optimized. These include building community, <br /> meeting people's needs (e.g., affordable quality housing, human services), supporting a diverse <br /> economy, conserving natural areas, minimizing pollution and waste, protecting the environment, and <br /> protecting the water supply. Tension arises when two or more of those objectives come into conflict. <br /> The current situation in Orange County is that of expansion of population and institutional activity on a <br /> scale that was hardly conceivable when the Comprehensive Plan was created. The principles driving <br /> its intent and purpose remain relevant. Increasing pressure in one area - the need for affordable <br /> housing for a rapidly increasing number of seniors - conflicts with a desire to resist any change to the <br /> rural character, such as increasing the density of development. Simply put, land suitable for <br /> congregate living for seniors in districts presently zoned for such purposes has grown scarce and <br /> prohibitively expensive for such projects. <br /> On the other hand, there are land use areas, namely Activity Nodes, that have been identified in the <br /> Comprehensive Plan in rural Orange County for greater intensity of development, such as Conditional <br /> Districts. Their applications have been relatively limited in regard to higher-density residential uses <br /> due to limitations in water availability and wastewater effluent absorption capacity. <br /> However, modern technology and planning principles go a long way toward maintaining a healthy <br /> balance while allowing more efficient use of land. For example, combining cluster neighborhoods with <br /> preservation of large swaths of open space instead of conventional subdivisions is a means of <br /> maintaining the rural character while allowing higher residential density. Community wastewater <br /> treatment technology now treats to a much higher standard of pollutant removal that allows more <br /> efficient effluent dispersal. We contend that these considerations allow a project such as the one <br /> proposed to establish a new favorable balance. <br /> A changing condition in Orange County that makes the proposed amendment reasonably necessary is <br /> "an explosion in the numbers of older persons, a dramatic increase in longer lives" described in the <br /> Orange County Master Aging Plan (MAP) of 2007. The most recent update of the MAP, (2022-27), <br /> reinforces this point with an estimate that the overall population will increase by 20% from 2020 to <br /> 2040, while the number of adult ages 65+ in Orange County is expected to increase over three times <br /> as fast- 68%! <br /> FLUM Amendment Narrative, Pg. 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.