Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-04-2025; 5-a - Applications for Zoning Atlas Amendment, Comprehensive Plan Amendments, & UDO Text Amendments to Realize “Fiddlehead Corner”, a Master Plan Development – Conditional District
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2020's
>
2025
>
Agenda - 02-04-2025 Business Meeting
>
Agenda - 02-04-2025; 5-a - Applications for Zoning Atlas Amendment, Comprehensive Plan Amendments, & UDO Text Amendments to Realize “Fiddlehead Corner”, a Master Plan Development – Conditional District
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/30/2025 1:32:28 PM
Creation date
1/30/2025 1:34:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/4/2025
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5-a
Document Relationships
Agenda for February 4, 2025 BOCC Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2025\Agenda - 02-04-2025 Business Meeting
Minutes 02-04-2025-Business Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2020's\2025
ORD-2025-005-An Ordinance Amending the UDO of Orange County
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2020-2029\2025
OTHER-2025-005-Acceptance of the Agricultural Growth Zone Grant with the North Carolina Department of Agriculture
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2020 - 2029\2025
OTHER-2025-006-CHCCS & OCS Schools Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance Approval of Membership and Capacity Numbers
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2020 - 2029\2025
OTHER-2025-007-OCS-SAPFO- Schools Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance -Approval of Membership and Capacity Numbers
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2020 - 2029\2025
OTHER-2025-015-Statement of Consistency of a Proposed UDO Text Amendment with Adopted Orange County Plans
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2020 - 2029\2025
OTHER-2025-016-Statement of Inconsistency of a Proposed Zoning Atlas Map Amendment with the Adopted Orange County 2030 Comprehensive Plan and Other ApplicableAdopted Plans
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2020 - 2029\2025
PRO-2025-001-Black History Month Proclamation
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Proclamations\2020-2029\2025
RES-2025-010-Motor Vehicle Property Tax Release Refund
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2020-2029\2025
RES-2025-011-Late Applications for Property Tax Exemption Exclusion
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2020-2029\2025
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
361
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
285 <br /> Approved 8.7.24 <br /> 1800 Chris Johnston: I would make a motion, and this is to put a flag up. The motion is to reject the three <br /> 1801 agenda items as presented and submit to the County Commissioners as such. <br /> 1802 <br /> 1803 Statler Gilfillen: Will second that. <br /> 1804 <br /> 1805 Beth Bronson: Each one of these needs to be an individual motion? <br /> 1806 <br /> 1807 Adam Beeman: Perdita is going to clarify for us. <br /> 1808 <br /> 1809 Perdita Holtz: It would be good if you could do three separate motions, and if you could use the words <br /> 1810 approve or deny instead of reject. <br /> 1811 <br /> 1812 Chris Johnston: Okay. I make a motion to deny Agenda Item 7 and submit that to the Board of County <br /> 1813 Commissioners. <br /> 1814 <br /> 1815 Statler Gilfillen: Second that. <br /> 1816 <br /> 1817 Chris Johnston: All of these seemed tied together, so,just to confirm, we're doing this three separate <br /> 1818 times? <br /> 1819 <br /> 1820 Perdita Holtz: You need to, for a couple of them state why you're doing it, not for the comp plan, but for <br /> 1821 the rezoning. You have to state why you're doing it. There's a statement of consistency <br /> 1822 and such. <br /> 1823 <br /> 1824 Chris Johnston: Sure. Of course. <br /> 1825 <br /> 1826 Beth Bronson: So, before you finish with that motion, because I think you're on the right track, I would <br /> 1827 like to make a motion to extend the meeting time. Like 15 minutes, if needed be, up to <br /> 1828 10:30. Just making sure because we have three different motions to go through. <br /> 1829 <br /> 1830 Chris Johnston: I was planning on doing all three in tandem because I think all three of them depend on <br /> 1831 each other. <br /> 1832 <br /> 1833 Adam Beeman: If we get to 10:00 here we'll vote on a push out. <br /> 1834 <br /> 1835 Patrick Mallett: Just to clarify, we'll do them in succession, but they're different applications that have <br /> 1836 different case numbers, so we could do them in rapid succession, but they really do need <br /> 1837 to be three separate items. And 'its approval or denial on all, as Perdita said, on the <br /> 1838 zoning case, you need to have a statement of inconsistency or consistency. <br /> 1839 <br /> 1840 Chris Johnston: Lamar, would you mind handling that now?You are so much better at this than I am. <br /> 1841 <br /> 1842 Patrick Mallett: You need to articulate why. <br /> 1843 <br /> 1844 Adam Beeman: We'll start with 7. <br /> 1845 <br /> 1846 Lamar Proctor: Does 7 need a statement of inconsistency? <br /> 1847 <br /> 1848 Perdita Holtz: No, it does not. <br /> 1849 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.