Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-04-2025; 5-a - Applications for Zoning Atlas Amendment, Comprehensive Plan Amendments, & UDO Text Amendments to Realize “Fiddlehead Corner”, a Master Plan Development – Conditional District
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2020's
>
2025
>
Agenda - 02-04-2025 Business Meeting
>
Agenda - 02-04-2025; 5-a - Applications for Zoning Atlas Amendment, Comprehensive Plan Amendments, & UDO Text Amendments to Realize “Fiddlehead Corner”, a Master Plan Development – Conditional District
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/30/2025 1:32:28 PM
Creation date
1/30/2025 1:34:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/4/2025
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5-a
Document Relationships
Agenda for February 4, 2025 BOCC Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2025\Agenda - 02-04-2025 Business Meeting
Minutes 02-04-2025-Business Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2020's\2025
ORD-2025-005-An Ordinance Amending the UDO of Orange County
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2020-2029\2025
OTHER-2025-005-Acceptance of the Agricultural Growth Zone Grant with the North Carolina Department of Agriculture
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2020 - 2029\2025
OTHER-2025-006-CHCCS & OCS Schools Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance Approval of Membership and Capacity Numbers
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2020 - 2029\2025
OTHER-2025-007-OCS-SAPFO- Schools Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance -Approval of Membership and Capacity Numbers
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2020 - 2029\2025
OTHER-2025-015-Statement of Consistency of a Proposed UDO Text Amendment with Adopted Orange County Plans
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2020 - 2029\2025
OTHER-2025-016-Statement of Inconsistency of a Proposed Zoning Atlas Map Amendment with the Adopted Orange County 2030 Comprehensive Plan and Other ApplicableAdopted Plans
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2020 - 2029\2025
PRO-2025-001-Black History Month Proclamation
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Proclamations\2020-2029\2025
RES-2025-010-Motor Vehicle Property Tax Release Refund
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2020-2029\2025
RES-2025-011-Late Applications for Property Tax Exemption Exclusion
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2020-2029\2025
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
361
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
255 <br /> Approved 8.7.24 <br /> 303 record available any time somebody wants to look at it. One of the things that I think Pat <br /> 304 and I talked about is an aspect of reporting that information back to the County. The <br /> 305 County is left out of that process. Local government is left out of that process via the <br /> 306 federal regulations, but it's a piece of information for follow up to verify that the <br /> 307 development is doing what it says it was going to do, and so that's another mechanism of <br /> 308 making sure that it happens. <br /> 309 <br /> 310 Adam Beeman: Thank you. <br /> 311 <br /> 312 Beth Bronson: The only other condition I would discuss is basically you were explaining about the first <br /> 313 responder, you referred to the Goldmine Loop entrance as an emergency vehicle only <br /> 314 entrance. <br /> 315 <br /> 316 Scott Radway: Yes. <br /> 317 <br /> 318 Beth Bronson: And is that the original intention and is that an okay condition for the approval? <br /> 319 <br /> 320 Scott Radway: I would say the original intention when we did the first concept, no it wasn't based on <br /> 321 where dwelling units were in initial concepts and as they evolved we reached the point <br /> 322 where it became apparent that most of our development was going to go out to, and the <br /> 323 application you have with the location of dwelling units, neighbors across the street on <br /> 324 Goldmine Road, Mr. Fox and his family and their neighbors, when we met with them two <br /> 325 times at least, discussed the issue of traffic coming out and being on that road, and so we <br /> 326 did explore what mechanism is there for doing an emergency services access entrance <br /> 327 only, and so again, back to talking to emergency services and go through all of the other <br /> 328 pieces that have to go through there, and as a County, you already have standards for the <br /> 329 kind of gated emergency vehicle access that could be used, and so there is both the <br /> 330 standard and a model in many places already in the county for that kind of gate piece to <br /> 331 occur. We have thought about where it might be, along that entrance road, how it would <br /> 332 make possible for somebody who makes a mistake to get into the site and turn around <br /> 333 safely, so the gate might not be right at the edge of the property. It might be internal to <br /> 334 the property some distance, but the goal and the effect would be to keep all of the <br /> 335 Fiddlehead Corner traffic going out onto Morrow Mill Road. Back to your back and forth <br /> 336 and the discussion among yourselves and with the community, is if you think that's <br /> 337 inadvisable with the issues around the neighborhood, I'd suggest that you put that within <br /> 338 your recommendations. <br /> 339 <br /> 340 Beth Bronson: Thank you very much for providing those responses and clarification. <br /> 341 <br /> 342 Adam Beeman: So, we're going to head to public comment. There's a time of 3 minutes. We have one <br /> 343 person that was granted 12 minutes to speak. She will speak first. I'm going to call three <br /> 344 names. If you guys just want to come up, stand in the line and we can move through this <br /> 345 because if everybody here speaks we have 3 hours of public comment. I need to ask that <br /> 346 if it's redundant and repetitive, please just say I agree with so and so and we can kind of <br /> 347 get through this. I'm not trying to strip you from your time, but to hear you say it over and <br /> 348 over again it's going to be a long night. <br /> 349 <br /> 350 Charity Kirk: Should they clarify the topic they're supposed to be speaking about. <br /> 351 <br /> 352 Adam Beeman: We're just going to let them have their 3 minutes. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.