Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-04-2025; 5-a - Applications for Zoning Atlas Amendment, Comprehensive Plan Amendments, & UDO Text Amendments to Realize “Fiddlehead Corner”, a Master Plan Development – Conditional District
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2020's
>
2025
>
Agenda - 02-04-2025 Business Meeting
>
Agenda - 02-04-2025; 5-a - Applications for Zoning Atlas Amendment, Comprehensive Plan Amendments, & UDO Text Amendments to Realize “Fiddlehead Corner”, a Master Plan Development – Conditional District
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/30/2025 1:32:28 PM
Creation date
1/30/2025 1:34:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/4/2025
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5-a
Document Relationships
Agenda for February 4, 2025 BOCC Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2025\Agenda - 02-04-2025 Business Meeting
Minutes 02-04-2025-Business Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2020's\2025
ORD-2025-005-An Ordinance Amending the UDO of Orange County
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2020-2029\2025
OTHER-2025-005-Acceptance of the Agricultural Growth Zone Grant with the North Carolina Department of Agriculture
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2020 - 2029\2025
OTHER-2025-006-CHCCS & OCS Schools Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance Approval of Membership and Capacity Numbers
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2020 - 2029\2025
OTHER-2025-007-OCS-SAPFO- Schools Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance -Approval of Membership and Capacity Numbers
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2020 - 2029\2025
OTHER-2025-015-Statement of Consistency of a Proposed UDO Text Amendment with Adopted Orange County Plans
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2020 - 2029\2025
OTHER-2025-016-Statement of Inconsistency of a Proposed Zoning Atlas Map Amendment with the Adopted Orange County 2030 Comprehensive Plan and Other ApplicableAdopted Plans
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2020 - 2029\2025
PRO-2025-001-Black History Month Proclamation
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Proclamations\2020-2029\2025
RES-2025-010-Motor Vehicle Property Tax Release Refund
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2020-2029\2025
RES-2025-011-Late Applications for Property Tax Exemption Exclusion
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2020-2029\2025
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
361
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
214 <br /> Approved 7.10.24 <br /> 253 everyone who wants to comment about 9. So'that's how the individuals on the sign-up sheet and then as to this <br /> 254 motion for 12 minutes for Preserve Rural Orange, I did have a second all in favor raise your hand. Okay. <br /> 255 <br /> 256 Lauren Coffey: Could you please clarify any opposed? <br /> 257 <br /> 258 Lamar Proctor: Yeah, any opposed? <br /> 259 <br /> 260 MOTION BY Statler Gilfillen to allow 12 minutes for Preserve Rural Orange. Seconded by Steve Kaufmann <br /> 261 <br /> 262 IN FAVOR: Statler Gilfillen, Marilyn Carter, Steve Kaufmann, Lamar Proctor, Charity Kirk,Whitney Watson, Liz <br /> 263 Kalies, Dolores Bailey, Beth Bronson <br /> 264 OPPOSED: Chris Johnston <br /> 265 MOTION PASSED 9 TO <br /> 266 <br /> 267 Lamar Proctor: Okay, so the motion passes,so Preserve Rural Orange will get 12 minutes. As to their placement in <br /> 268 this process, I will entertain any discussion about their placement in the public comment section. <br /> 269 <br /> 270 Chris Johnston: I make a motion that we place them before the public comments, right after the questions from the <br /> 271 board. <br /> 272 <br /> 273 Lamar Proctor: Okay. <br /> 274 <br /> 275 Statler Gilfillen: I'll second that. <br /> 276 <br /> 277 Marilyn Carter: I missed that,what'd you say? <br /> 278 <br /> 279 Chris Johnston: The motion is to put them before the public comments and directly after questions from the board. <br /> 280 <br /> 281 Lamar Proctor: Now I heard a second, do you need discussion? <br /> 282 <br /> 283 Charity Kirk: The other option is just at the start of agenda Item 9 since I believe that's probably what you're <br /> 284 talking about. <br /> 285 <br /> 286 Lamar Proctor: We could put them at the beginning of public comment,we could put them after 7 is done,we <br /> 287 could put them after 8 is done,we could put them after 9 is done. <br /> 288 <br /> 289 Chris Johnston: I have my motion and a second. <br /> 290 <br /> 291 Dolores Bailey: Question. Is there a reason why you think they should go first.Why shouldn't they just go in order <br /> 292 to how they signed up,where they signed up? <br /> 293 <br /> 294 Chris Johnston: To move the process along. <br /> 295 <br /> 296 Lamar Proctor: Are they signed up on a particular agenda item or they signed up on all three. <br /> 297 <br /> 298 Cy Stober: They were the first individual signed up on Agenda Item 9. <br /> 299 <br /> 300 Chris Johnston: I amend my motion to be the presentation at the beginning of Item 9. <br /> 301 <br /> 302 Lamar Proctor: And they'll be the first presenter on Agenda Item 9. All right, all in, do I have a second on that? <br /> 303 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.