12.11.24 BOA Agenda Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

1 Kevin Hornik: Well, I always like to hear that. Thank you. 2 3 Leon Meyers: All right. 4 5 Taylor Perschau: Now it comes to you all for a time for any questions, deliberations, and finally a determination of 6 findings of fact. As the applicant detailed, the planning director did determine that the application 7 satisfies established submittal requirements, and there is sufficient documentation demonstrating 8 general compliance with established development standards, as detailed in Section 5.6.8 of the 9 UDO. Staff doesn't make a formal recommendation on the approval of the application or on the 10 compliance of the project with the general standards in Section 5.3.2.(A).(2), so you all must 11 determine if the use will maintain or promote the public health, safety, and general welfare if located 12 where proposed and developed and operated according to the plan as submitted; if these will 13 maintain or enhance the value of contiguous property, unless the use is a public necessity, in which 14 case the use may not maintain or enhance the value of contiguous property; and finally, you must 15 determine if the location and character of the use, if developed according to the plan submitted, will 16 be in harmony with the area in which it is to be located, and the use is in compliance with the plan 17 for the physical development of the county as embodied in these regulations or in the comprehensive 18 plan, or a portion thereof adopted by the Board of County Commissioners. I'm going to defer to you, 19 Chair Meyers, if you want more detail from me or if you want to go ahead and kind of start making 20 your deliberations. 21 22 Leon Meyers: Board members, would some additional information from Taylor be helpful, or should we bring the 23 application before the board and discuss? Questions for Taylor? Sounds like we're well informed. 24 That's a dangerous statement. Good, well, the application then is before the board. There are some 25 conditions that are listed in the application on Page 34 and in Exhibit E on Page 44, and Mr. Hornik, 26 I assume there's no change in those conditions that have been a part of the application. 27 28 Kevin Hornik: That's correct to the best of my knowledge. I'll ask Mr. Tilson to confirm that. 29 30 James Tilson: Correct. 31 32 Leon Meyers: Okay. Then the findings I think, would be the first decision for the board. Is that right, legal 33 department? Right? The findings are on Page 111 of the package. And unless there is anything 34 that the board needs to discuss, a motion would be in order to approve the findings listed on, I'm 35 sorry, tagged Page 109 in the package. 36 37 Nathan Robinson: I make a motion to approve finding of facts on Page 111. 38 39 Leon Meyers: Motioned. Is there a second to approve the findings? 40 41 Greg Niemiroski: Second. 42 43 Leon Meyers: Any discussion on the findings for Case A-6-24? If not, all in favor, please say aye. 44 45 MOTION was made by Nathan Robinson. Seconded by Greg Niemiroski. 46 47 VOTE: Unanimous 48 Leon Meyers: And then please help me here, James, I believe the next motion would be, in this case, to grant the 49 special-use permit. Is that right? 50 11