|
Attachment 6C
<br />
<br />CONCLUSIONS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
<br />PERTAINING TO A REQUEST SUBMITTED BY
<br />JAMES TILSON AND MICHAEL TILSON
<br />PROPOSING A KENNELS (CLASS II) USE
<br />ON A PARCEL OF PROPERTY LOCATED OFF MONOTROPA TRAIL
<br />(PIN 9832-60-7469)
<br />When applying the adopted Findings of Fact to the relevant Standards found in the UDO, the
<br />Orange County Board of Adjustments makes the following Conclusions:
<br />
<br />1. All necessary submittal requirements were met, including:
<br />a. Submittal of proper forms (UDO 2.2, Finding of Fact 1); and,
<br />b. Fees paid (UDO 2.2.4, Finding of Fact 1); and,
<br />c. The use was fully described (UDO 2.5.3(F) and 2.7.3(B)(1), Finding of Fact 2-6);
<br />and,
<br />d. Owner Information was provided (UDO 2.7.3(B)(2), Finding of Fact 1 and 2); and,
<br />e. The facilities were described (UDO 2.7.3(B)(1), Finding of Fact 2-6); and,
<br />f. Access, parking, and Kennels (Class II) use were identified (UDO 2.5.3(F),
<br />2.5.3(L), 5.6.8, Finding of Fact 5 and 13); and,
<br />g. Plans were identified (UDO 2.5.3(K) and 2.7.3(B)(1), Finding of Fact 2 and 14);
<br />and,
<br />h. Site plans were submitted, (UDO 2.5, Finding of Fact 2 and 14); and,
<br />i. A list of parcels within 1,000’ was provided (UDO 2.7.3(B)(5), Finding of Fact 2);
<br />and,
<br />j. Environmental Assessment was submitted (UDO 2.7.3(B)(7), Finding of Fact 2);
<br />and,
<br />k. Method of Debris Removal was described (UDO 2.7.3(B)(8), Finding of Fact 2);
<br />and,
<br />l. Development Schedule was provided (UDO 2.7.3(B)(9), Finding of Fact 2), and
<br />2. Proper notice was provided as required by statute and ordinance, including:
<br />a. Notice was mailed for the Neighborhood Information Meeting (UDO 2.7.5(B),
<br />Finding of Fact 8); and,
<br />b. Signs were posted for the Neighborhood Information Meeting (UDO 2.7.5(D),
<br />Finding of Fact 10); and,
<br />c. Notice was mailed for the Evidentiary Hearing (UDO 2.7.6(A)(1), Finding of Fact
<br />9); and,
<br />d. Signs were posted for the Evidentiary Hearing (UDO 2.7.6(A)(2), Finding of Fact
<br />10).
<br />3. Waste, Safety and Access requirements were met, including:
<br />a. The method and adequacy of providing for sewage disposal facilities, solid waste
<br />and water service is sufficient for the proposed use (UDO 5.3.2(B)(1), Finding of
<br />Fact 2 and 11); and,
<br />b. The method and adequacy of police fire and rescue squad protection is sufficient
<br />for the proposed use (UDO 5.3.2(B)(2), Finding of Fact 2 and 12); and,
<br />c. The method and adequacy of vehicle access to the site and traffic conditions
<br />around the site are sufficient for the proposed use (UDO 5.3.2(B)(3), Finding of
<br />Fact 2 and 13).
<br />4. Standards specific to the Kennels (Class II) use were met, including:
<br />a. A proper site plan submitted (UDO Section 2.5), Finding of Fact 2 and 14); and,
<br />b. The site is of an adequate size to protect adjacent properties from adverse effects
<br />of the kennel (UDO Section 5.6.8(B)(2)(a), Finding of Fact 2 and 16); and,
|