Browse
Search
12-4-24 PB Agenda Packet
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Agendas
>
2024
>
12-4-24 PB Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/6/2024 3:54:32 PM
Creation date
12/6/2024 3:53:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/4/2024
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
17 <br /> DRAFT <br /> 548 well. And then, again, I mentioned just the extension of the calendar. Additional meetings with <br /> 549 the county commissioners take preparation and feedback, and sometimes go in a little bit different <br /> 550 direction, so that equates to time as well. <br /> 551 <br /> 552 Adam Beeman: Any other questions? <br /> 553 <br /> 554 Beth Bronson: Are they doing another Facebook or another ad campaign that's in the included budget for the <br /> 555 second outreach, or is this second outreach part of the contract amendment? <br /> 556 <br /> 557 Tom Altieri: So,the county is doing all the notification. <br /> 558 <br /> 559 Beth Bronson: So,then you guys are planning to do another? I will say that when we spoke back about the <br /> 560 interactive map and I suggested leaving it up throughout this process or leaving the surveys up <br /> 561 throughout the longer period—and if you are going to be putting new online interactive maps up, <br /> 562 that's totally different. But by saying that like, by leaving up an aggregate of answers and then just <br /> 563 saying,for the purposes of these results, all answers received by August 25th were included. And <br /> 564 then at the next time,you can just include or cite a snapshot of what answers were included. Is <br /> 565 that a way to save time or energy to keep these resources up that maybe aren't being utilized very <br /> 566 much now but, in 6 months, may be heavily trafficked? <br /> 567 <br /> 568 Tom Altieri: Not sure I'm totally understanding the question. There is a kickoff to the engagement window and <br /> 569 then a closing of the engagement window, and it's like September 18th the survey goes live, and <br /> 570 then it'll be shut down November 3rd. Then that's when the consultant has to consider the input <br /> 571 that's received to then use it to go to the next step and develop the draft plan and draft policies. <br /> 572 And then that would be released for the third engagement window. <br /> 573 <br /> 574 Beth Bronson: Okay. So, it would just be this one. <br /> 575 <br /> 576 Tom Altieri: Yes. <br /> 577 <br /> 578 Cy Stober: To re-emphasize, this is a one-way trip,so the feedback we receive is on the road map. You <br /> 579 know,we're not revisiting these points. We are collecting the feedback,and we're preserving it, <br /> 580 and we are asking for the public's trust that we do have it. And it will be collected, and I think <br /> 581 we've got good evidence from Clarion that they're summarizing it in reports to the county, and <br /> 582 that's how it's being collected. There will be further opportunities for participation, but we don't <br /> 583 want to confuse the matter. We certainly want people to think that we're revisiting topics that, to <br /> 584 our minds as professionals, have been resolved and, good, bad, in between,we're moving <br /> 585 forward with. <br /> 586 <br /> 587 Beth Bronson: And that does make sense. Maybe just a suggestion for the planning board that we could add it <br /> 588 as an agenda item over the next couple months after, like in between the second and third <br /> 589 engagement window,there might be an opportunity where we can talk about this as an either an <br /> 590 information topic, and I'm not requiring you to necessarily come and present on everything, but for <br /> 591 us to have a discussion about anything we've thought about or talked about. It would give a public <br /> 592 forum setting. So, I don't know if you guys are interested in that or how we would make a motion <br /> 593 to discuss that further or later with the planning staff, but having more informal and, I think, open <br /> 594 conversations in this public setting is a way that we can participate together. I just wanted to put <br /> 595 that out there. <br /> 596 <br /> 597 Dolores Bailey: Tom, you mentioned earlier local leaders. Are you in touch with African American leaders, and <br /> 598 who are some of those that you are reaching out to? Clarion, right? Clarion is doing the <br /> 599 reaching? <br /> 600 <br /> 601 Tom Altieri: Yeah, I'm doing that. <br /> 602 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.