Browse
Search
12-4-24 PB Agenda Packet
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Agendas
>
2024
>
12-4-24 PB Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/6/2024 3:54:32 PM
Creation date
12/6/2024 3:53:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/4/2024
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
15 <br /> DRAFT <br /> 438 towns. So, are you looking at extending the municipality boundaries so that they just take care of <br /> 439 the poop,or how would you encourage a new town somewhere to focus development? Like in <br /> 440 this day and age, are new towns even possible? <br /> 441 <br /> 442 Tom Altieri: These are all great questions,and we're looking for feedback on these things. And what our <br /> 443 community members think? <br /> 444 <br /> 445 Charity Kirk: So,the rural buffer is under question. <br /> 446 <br /> 447 Tom Altieri: Well, potentially. <br /> 448 <br /> 449 Charity Kirk: Okay. All right.Thank you. <br /> 450 <br /> 451 Cy Stober: I've spoken about this before,and I'll maintain my personal and professional position, but I also <br /> 452 think the county department's position. If we do not ask the question, "Is the rural buffer serving <br /> 453 the county's goals?"we as planners,we're being cowardly, and we're not doing our jobs. The <br /> 454 answer may be it is doing a great job and we need to maintain it, or may even need to expand it or <br /> 455 strengthen it. That's fine. That's great feedback. It also may be it's not working as intended and <br /> 456 needs some modification, or we want to get rid of it. I mean,those are extremes. But we need to <br /> 457 ask the question, and we need to have it documented what the answer generally is. And I would <br /> 458 also note, as Tom covered in Scenario 2,that is very much an open-space agricultural protection <br /> 459 scenario. Frankly, and then we have Scenario 1,which is the business-as-usual model,which is <br /> 460 largely the framework of growth and development in the county, and preservation and protection is <br /> 461 maintained as it is today. <br /> 462 <br /> 463 Charity Kirk: Are you specifically asking about the rural buffer in your questions, or is it just sort of one of the <br /> 464 options? Because that seems to be at least sort of a thing around the Chapel Hill-Carrboro area, <br /> 465 like people know that term. <br /> 466 <br /> 467 Tom Altieri: The consultant will be presenting the maps to the county commissioners at their September 10th <br /> 468 work session. The maps are in the report that I mentioned,so you'll be able to see them very <br /> 469 soon. And one of the areas that is addressed in that Alternative 4 was the mixed-use center. We <br /> 470 mentioned Southern Village as a potential example. That would be one of the areas that is shown <br /> 471 on the map as the area around Blackwood Station on new NC-86,for example. So, that area <br /> 472 would extend into what is currently the rural buffer. <br /> 473 <br /> 474 Charity Kirk: Because the sewer question is a very interesting applicable question to the rural buffer area and <br /> 475 how we take care of our waste. <br /> 476 <br /> 477 Tom Altieri: Right. <br /> 478 <br /> 479 Adam Beeman: Anybody else have any other questions? <br /> 480 <br /> 481 Beth Bronson: Tom, I apologize. I did not hear the four descriptions. I have reviewed the maps, but I did not <br /> 482 hear your descriptions, so I appreciate it. I had a question about Land-Use Alternative 3 versus 4. <br /> 483 You see, up new 86, 1 guess? So, it goes along 40 outside, between basically new 86 and 15- <br /> 484 501. Just trying to make sure I understand. It's a rural conservation neighborhood, along,versus <br /> 485 mixed-use area in the Land Alternative 4. It's that density between Chapel Hill and Hillsborough. <br /> 486 <br /> 487 Tom Altieri: I'm sorry. I'm not understanding the question. And I don't have the benefit of seeing the map. <br /> 488 <br /> 489 Beth Bronson: Oh, you guys don't have maps? <br /> 490 <br /> 491 Tom Altieri: No,the maps aren't part of the presentation. No. <br /> 492 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.