Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
21 <br /> 1 Slide #2 <br /> Stalceholder Concerns <br /> tr Process and Scorecard confusing and subjective <br /> Leveraging and repayment to county needs to be <br /> reevaluated <br /> The following criteria and/or projects need more <br /> prioritization: <br /> Repair/rehabilitation projects <br /> Applicant past performance/accountability <br /> Housing for 60%AMI and below <br /> Residents with disabilities <br /> Naturally Occurring Affordable Housing (NOAH) <br /> ORANGE COUNTY <br /> +�► HOUSING DEPARTMENT <br /> 2 <br /> 3 <br /> 4 Slide #3 <br /> General changes to process <br /> Affordable Housing Advisory Board (AHAB) will not <br /> score projects <br /> AHAB scared projects for first time in 2023 <br /> Scoring shifts back to staff interdepartmental work group <br /> • Staff will present scores to AHAB for comment before BOCC <br /> Add 10% CIP carve-out for Repair/Rehabilitation <br /> New scoring matrix will be created for repair/rehabilitation <br /> proposals, to be reviewed by the Board at a later date. <br /> Simplify scorecard, prioritize 60%AMI or below <br /> projects, assess applicants" past performance, and <br /> streamline monitoring/evaluation <br /> ORANGE COUNTY <br /> O HOUSING DEPARTMENT <br /> 5 <br /> 6 Commissioner Fowler asked if this precludes them from applying to the other part. <br /> 7 Blake Rosser said it would not, but it might make it difficult to complete. He said that they <br /> 8 can discuss how to weigh that scorecard. He said that having a separate pool might take care of <br /> 9 that issue. <br /> 10 Commissioner Portie-Ascott asked the annual income equivalent to 60% AMI. <br /> 11 Aaron Cohen said for a family of 4 it is roughly $82,000, but it depends on family size. <br /> 12 Blake Rosser said the last two items they feel will address the concerns about naturally <br /> 13 affordable housing. <br /> 14 <br /> 15 <br />