Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-04-2004-5m
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2004
>
Agenda - 05-04-2004
>
Agenda - 05-04-2004-5m
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/1/2008 11:43:38 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:41:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/4/2004
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5m
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20040504
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~--~~ <br />ORANGE COUNTY <br />ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCE CONSERVATION <br />DEPARTMENT <br />MEMORANDUM <br />To: <br />David Stancil, Environment and Resource Conservation Director <br />Lori Taft, Recreation and Parks Director <br />From: Tina Moon, Land Use/Preservation Planner <br />Date: March 2, 2004 <br />Updated, March 22, 2004 <br />Re: Laws House -Little River Park and Natural Area <br />Reuse & Stabilization <br />As the budget requirements associated with the Little River Park and Natural Area continue to <br />increase staff from both counties have looked far options to reduce costs. Qne major question <br />is what to do with the Laws House, the existing turn-of-the-century dwelling located near the <br />park entrance.. There are several viable options, and county staff should consider each option <br />carefully since the first few park projects are likely to be precedent setting. <br />There are seven basic alternatives for the Laws House: <br />1) Demolish the house; <br />2) Deconstruct the house; <br />3) Move the house off the site; <br />4) Relocate the house to another area on the site; <br />5) Stabilize the house and consider future use(s) and renovation plans; <br />6) Renovate the house for immediate re-use; or <br />7) Renovate the exterior of the house as an attractive shell for atmosphere, <br />use the interior for storage. <br />1) Demolish the house. Demolition offers a "quick-and-dirty" albeit shortsighted <br />solution. The immediate costs would be those associated with contracting out a <br />wrecking crew to obtain a demolition permit, bulldoze the stricture, separate the <br />materials, transport the materials to the landfill, and pay for disposal. Unfortunately, <br />once the house is destroyed it (along with any associated information) is gone forever. <br />This is particularly important if there is any interest in developing interpretative signs or <br />historic trails on the park site, The mill sites, though interesting, are gone; any display <br />signage would be largely speculative. The caretaker's cottage is a substantially altered <br />dwelling, from another time period, moved from another part of the county. It has no <br />historic significance to the property and may in fact cause visitors confusion over the <br />progression of history on the site. The Laws farmstead is the only building complex that <br />people can actually see and touch that is linked the to the property, not to mention its <br />association to the Laws family--prominent Qrange County landowners dating back to the <br />1700s. This touches on some hardcore preservation philosophies about misinforming <br />the public with rewritten history, <br />Orange County's policy to encourage deconstruction whenever it appears feasible may eliminate demolition as an <br />option. The administrative issues associated with storing salvaged construction material and setting up a mechanism <br />to reuse it within a reasonable length of time, however, may limit the practically of deconstruction for this project. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.