2024-09-11 BOER Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Docusign Envelope ID:0776C7AB-OEE6-4D95-94E7-C84FDD4E6E17 Time of Hearing 2:46 PM Appellant Opinion $575,900 County Representative Chad Phillips on Board Decision $700,000 behalf of Roger Gunn Evidence submitted by the appellant: • The land assessed value is incorrect. The adjacent lots are calculated at much lower rate than the subject lot. They have assessed values between$5.89 per square foot and$9.72 per square foot. However,the subject lot has been assessed at$13.12 per square foot even though it has a significantly lower appeal based on location and other factors. Evidence submitted by the county representative: • All properties in the subject neighborhood are valued at$320,000 per lot with adjustments to value made to properties with significantly larger or smaller than typical lot sizes as was with PIN 9788518063 in the appellant's spreadsheet. Based on a size basis,it is felt that the subject's .61 acre lot is equitably valued at$320,000 with the majority of lots in the appellant's spreadsheet as well as with a same sized parcel 9788515246 and.52 acre parcel 9788513193 and.55 acre parcel 9788513340,none of which were included in the appellant's spreadsheet. • However,when comparing the subject lot to adjacent .69 acre parcel 9788611008 on the appellant's spreadsheet,we find that the lot for parcel 9788611008 is only valued at$288,000 reflecting a-10%adjustment for backing to Fordham Boulevard and being subject to highway road noise. Considering the subject is similarly situated, it is the County's recommendation to apply the same-10% adjustment to the subject's land value,thereby reducing the subject's land value from$320,000 to$288,000. • Upon inspecting the subject on September 3, 2024,Bill found the finished area was understated by 318 square feet due to finished area over the garage not being included. he also found that the subject only contained 4 bedrooms instead of 5 and the construction grade was slightly high at B+05 compared with the adjacent homes on parcels 9788611008 and 9788612237,which both have a construction grade of B. After making these building adjustments,the building value would be increased from$395,900 to $412,000. • Photographs of subject property • Current property record card for subject • Map highlighting subject property and properties discussed in County's Position • Proposed property record card for subject Motion of the Board $700,000 Made the motion Barbara Levine Seconded the motion Tony Blake Voted For Leon Meyers Voted Against Property Identification: