Browse
Search
Approved Minutes of April 24, 2024
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Board of Health
>
Minutes
>
2024
>
Approved Minutes of April 24, 2024
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/23/2024 4:32:59 PM
Creation date
10/23/2024 4:30:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/24/2024
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
Document Relationships
Approved Agenda April 24, 2024
(Attachment)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Board of Health\Agendas\2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br /> ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF HEALTH <br /> April 24, 2024 <br /> • Mr. Bagby asked how the BOCC had decided to allocate the funding, to which Ms. <br /> Stewart replied that the BOCC received applications from community partners, which <br /> were reviewed by the Advisory Committee. The Advisory Committee made <br /> recommendations and the BOCC then selected proposals. She added that the first year <br /> of funding approvals required some trial and error, but the parameters are clearer now. <br /> • In response to Dr. Royce's question about evaluation and accountability for the funded <br /> opioid programs, Ms. Stewart explained that it is a requirement for all programs receiving <br /> opioid settlement funds to report annually about their processes and impact. <br /> • Dr. Royce asked if the funds were designated only for opioid use or if they could also be <br /> used for programs targeting other substances based on need, to which Ms. Stewart <br /> replied that programs must be opioid-targeted but are allowed to address other <br /> substances tangentially. <br /> • Mr. Whitaker asked about municipal areas in the county and whether they receive <br /> funding and representation for allocation decisions, as the MOU is primarily county <br /> centric. Ms. Stewart explained that some larger municipalities statewide are receiving <br /> funding, but most are not. However, municipal law enforcement agencies are <br /> represented on the Advisory Committees and are in contact with elected officials, so <br /> municipal representatives are not locked out of the loop. Municipal elected officials are <br /> also required to be invited to all annual community meetings. <br /> • In response to Dr. Crandell's question about funding for law enforcement to help address <br /> the influx of illegal Fentanyl, Ms. Stewart said that provision of Fentanyl test strips to <br /> community members is covered by opioid settlement funding. <br /> • Dr. Jonnal wondered why there are no alcohol company settlements given the related <br /> harms, to which Commissioner Fowler replied that ABC Stores are required to help fund <br /> treatment and prevention programs, adding that the El Futuro, El Centro, and the <br /> Campus Community Coalition (CCC) are partially funded by the ABC Board. <br /> • Dr. Stuebe mentioned the Horizons Program, which is a substance treatment program in <br /> Orange County focused on pregnant and parenting individuals which has both in- and <br /> out-of-county participants; Ms. Stewart said that once you are in Orange County, <br /> community supports are available to you regardless of your county of origin. <br /> • Ms. Stewart concluded her presentation by sharing that the OCHD has made an offer to <br /> fill the Harm Reduction Coordinator role, and that employee will begin on May 4t" <br /> B. 2024 Board Retreat Evaluation <br /> Jean Phillips-Weiner, Board of Health Strategic Plan Manager, provided an overview of the data <br /> and results of the evaluation survey for the 2024 Board Retreat. <br /> Some highlights of her presentation are below: <br /> • Five of the eleven board members (45.45%) responded to the survey. Those who <br /> responded seemed to be satisfied overall with their retreat experience. However, several <br /> respondents felt that at least one of the retreat activities (such as the adjudication <br /> training or the discussion of priority areas) should have been longer or shorter. All <br /> respondents strongly agreed that they had gotten to know another board member better <br /> during the retreat and that they had learned something that would be useful to them as a <br /> board member going forward. <br /> • Dr. Pickett expressed concern about the low response rate, wondering if perhaps two <br /> thirds of the board members had strongly disliked the retreat and simply didn't want to <br /> say so. Several other board members chimed in that they felt this was unlikely, as <br /> generally people with strong negative feelings are more likely to respond to anonymous <br /> or semi-anonymous surveys compared to those who were relatively satisfied. Board <br /> S:\Managers Working Files\BOH\Agendas &Abstracts\2024 Agenda and Abstracts/ <br /> April Page 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.