Orange County NC Website
15 <br /> Slide #27 <br /> Itk <br /> Comparison of Outcomes <br /> Alternative#2 Alternative#3 Alternative#4 <br /> 1 nc reasi ng protedi o n o( <br /> high-value environmental, Wdium Medium Low <br /> agricultural,and rural lands <br /> I nc reasi ng a(fo rda 61e <br /> housing or increase housing Low High Medium <br /> stock <br /> I nc reasi ng po ten li a I to r <br /> transit use in unincorporated LOW Medium High <br /> Orange County <br /> ReducingVMTsorreducing Medium Low Medium <br /> greenhouse gases <br /> Creating new employment <br /> opportunities in Low Mediurn High <br /> unincorporated areas <br /> Chair Bedford asked that the word affordable be removed from the comparison, because <br /> she did not want the county to make that kind of promise and not be able to deliver. <br /> Commissioner McKee said he does not envision affordable housing occurring in the <br /> commercial sector. <br /> Commissioner Richards said it will not happen at a large scale. <br /> Leigh Anne King said they can focus on increasing housing stock in the alternatives. <br /> Slide #28 <br /> t, <br /> eChniCa Re <br /> port {•�} <br /> IDocuments the methodology, <br /> llanalysis, and outcomes. <br /> VIC <br /> Available online: <br /> https:llwww.crangecountylanduseplan.com/resources <br />