Browse
Search
10.21.2024 OUTboard
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange Unified Transportation Board
>
Agendas
>
2024
>
10.21.2024 OUTboard
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/15/2024 8:33:23 PM
Creation date
10/15/2024 8:30:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/21/2024
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Public Engagement Summary <br /> to be established with no corresponding improvements in local,two-lane roads" One comment opposed <br /> any new road capacity. <br /> Local Connectivity: Comments that support bolstering and expanding the transportation network within <br /> Orange County. Central themes in this category highlight a communal desire for safer bicycle and <br /> pedestrian paths, new sidewalks, and expanded service routes for public transit,with a focus on <br /> connecting people to points of interest, schools and jobs, and linking disjointed parts of the network. <br /> Regional Connectivity: Comments that support expansion of regional transit services to areas outside of <br /> Orange County. All comments in this category include interest in transit that connects Orange County to <br /> the Research Triangle, with several also showing interest in connectivity with adjacent counties, such as <br /> Chatham County. <br /> Accessibility: Comments mentioning a need for improved accessibility for seniors and people with <br /> disabilities. An example of such is "You should be making it easier for seniors and disabled to access <br /> necessary services." <br /> Optional Demographic Questions <br /> The end of the survey included optional demographic questions to help the study team understand the <br /> survey participants. Figures 4-10 show the results of those demographic questions. <br /> Age (98 responses) <br /> 45-64 40 <br /> 65 or older 33 <br /> 30-44 18 <br /> Prefer not to answer 4 <br /> 18-29 3 <br /> Less than 18 0 <br /> 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 <br /> Figure 8.Age <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.