Orange County NC Website
15 <br /> 1 Slide #27 <br /> Comparison of Outcomes ► <br /> Alternative#2 Alternative#3 Alternative#4 <br /> 1 nc reasi ng protecti o n o f <br /> high-value environmental, Medium Medium Low <br /> agricultural,and rural lands <br /> I ncreasi ng affordable <br /> housing or increase housing Low High Medium <br /> stork <br /> Increasing po ten tialtor <br /> transit use in unincorporated LOW Medium High <br /> Orange County <br /> R ed uc i ng V MTs or reduci ncj <br /> Medium Low Med:L:it <br /> greenhouse gases <br /> Creating new employment <br /> opportunities in Law Medium High m <br /> unincorporated areas <br /> 2 <br /> 3 Chair Bedford asked that the word affordable be removed from the comparison, because <br /> 4 she did not want the county to make that kind of promise and not be able to deliver. <br /> 5 Commissioner McKee said he does not envision affordable housing occurring in the <br /> 6 commercial sector. <br /> 7 Commissioner Richards said it will not happen at a large scale. <br /> 8 Leigh Anne King said they can focus on increasing housing stock in the alternatives. <br /> 9 <br /> 10 Slide #28 <br /> Technical Report <br /> LAND USE A LTERNATIVES <br /> EVALUATION REPORT <br /> Documents the methodology, <br /> a analysis, and outcomes. <br /> Available online: <br /> httpsalwww.crangecountylanduseplan.com/resouTces <br /> _t­'A N"I;"'I'� I j <br /> 11 <br /> 12 <br /> 13 <br /> 14 <br />