Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-21-2005-2
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2005
>
Agenda - 11-21-2005
>
Agenda - 11-21-2005-2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/1/2008 11:36:27 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:41:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/21/2005
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
2
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20051121
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment 4 <br />Land Use Density Options and Associated Buildout Conditions <br />Orange County Planning Jurisdiction Only (does not include ETJs or Municipalities) <br /> Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4 <br /> Existing Maximum Medium-Low Density Low Density/Low Vehicle Low Density/Land Equity Plan Lower° Density Plan Lowest Density Plan (Upper° Neuse <br /> Density Plan Plan Miles Traveled (VMT) Plan (Developed following 2004 (Similar to existing Cane Watershed Management Plan and <br /> outreach efforts in response to CreeldUniversity Lake Cape Tear River Assembly) <br /> citizen comments) Watershed land use ro ram) <br />Description of Option • Presented at • Presented at outreach • Presented at outreach • Presented at outreach meetings • Presented at outreach • Presented at outreach meetings <br /> outreach meetings meetings meetings . Within Upper Eno, change meetings • Within Cane Creek and <br /> • Status Quo - No Varied densities based • Platming Staffls density to match that which Countywide 1 du/5 ac University Lake Watersheds, No <br /> change to existing on the location of recommendation prior to can-ently exists for Cane Creek density, first 5 lots of a Change to existing density <br /> zoning densities wrprotected, protected, outreach meetings and University Lake subdivision maybe 2 ac • Balance of County Jurisdiction, 1 <br /> and critical watersheds • Varied densities based on Watersheds du/5 ac density <br /> and proximity to urban the location of unprotected, • Balance of County • Supported by UNRBA Watershed <br /> areas protected, and critical .Jurisdiction, 1 du/.3 ac density Management Plan and similar to <br /> watersheds and greater • Low Impact Design (LID) Cape Fear studies <br /> emphasis on proximity to suggested <br /> urban areas than that of <br /> Option 1 <br />New Rural and 145,000 +/- 75,000 +/- 65,000 +/- 55,000 +/- 50,000 +/- 35,000 +/- <br />Urbanizing Dwelling <br />Units Possible ~ <br />New Population .350,000 +/- 175,000 +/- 150,000 +/- 1.35,000 +/- 120,000 +/- 90,000 +/- <br />Possible <br />Total Dwelling Units 160,000 +/- 90,000 +/- 80,000 +/- 70,000 +/- 65,000 +/- 50,000 +/- <br />at Buildout <br />Total Population at 385,000 +/- 210,000 +/- 180,000 +/- 165,0001-/- 150,000 +/- 125,000 +/- <br />Buildout <br />Gross Average 1 du /1,3 ac +/- 1 du / 2.4 ac +/- 1 du / 2.8 ac +/- 1 du / 3.0 ac +/- 1 du / 3,3 ac +/- 1 du / 4,1 ac +/- <br />Density at <br />Buildout ~ <br />NOTES: <br />~ Future Dwelling Units Possible is subject to an increase based on the rezoning potential of designated urbanizing transition areas. <br />Z Average Historic Density is approximately 1 du/2.8 ac, excluding Mobile Home Parks. <br />Source: Orange County Plamring and Inspections Dept,, 10/28/04 <br />G:\Comprehensive Planning Div\GENE\2005 Public Hearings\Nov 21\OCCP-LUEPoIicyOptions\Projections under Options Rev 111605.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.