9-4-24 PB Agenda Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

9 DRAFT 149 recommendation from the Planning Director, and then ultimately make that 150 recommendation to the BOCC on the Statement of Consistency and the proposed 151 ordinance. So, if any of you have any questions for me, I am also up here as well. 152 Statler Gilfillen: I do have one question. Could this be considered in zoning a step down of less intensity 153 which we're approving tonight, or is this equal intensity,just something different? 154 Because I'm reading it and I'm listening to you, it sounds like what they're asking for is a 155 less intense situation. 156 Lauren Coffey: Correct, it is a down zoning back to their original designation from their rezoning to a 157 master plan. 158 Statler GiIfillen: Thank you. 159 Adam Beeman: The question was, we have potential to see them in the future to come back under a 160 flexible zoning, so this is just the step you have to take to get to that point. 161 Lauren Coffey: Yeah. 162 Adam Beeman: You got that? 163 Statler GiIfillen: Yeah. 164 Adam Beeman: Okay. Thank you, any other questions? All right. 165 Lamar Proctor: I move to approve the zoning change and adopt the statement of consistency as drafted 166 by planning staff and finding that the zoning change is consistent with the comprehensive 167 land use plan and reverting it back to a zoning designation consistent with the surrounding 168 parcels. 169 Statler GiIfillen: I'll second that. 170 Adam Beeman: All good? I just wanted to make sure I didn't have corrections from staff that we missed 171 something in the statement. 172 Patrick Mallett: The only thing to point out is the zoning was done several years ago, we've made 173 changes to the subdivision ordinance, they've got a workable option based on the realities 174 of economics and their need, but yeah, this is the first part of several processes that they'll 175 have to go through. I would also note that they have been in discussion with county 176 commissioners and with DEAPR on dedicating a significant amount of conservation area 177 on the property. 178 Chris Johnston: I just want to note,just so we don't appear flippant, you're requesting R1, you're 179 completely surrounded by R1, you're going conventional, so we're not going to have any 180 stipulations that we're allowed to put on it. I mean, it's pretty cut and dry as far as we can 181 tell on this. Just so you don't feel like we're sweeping you along or anything like that. 182 Patrick Mallett: Yeah, and they are fully aware that once the zoning is approved that it extinguishes all the 183 rights that they had gained with the previous zoning. 184 Statler GiIfillen: And moving forward they then have to come back to us again for approvals. 185 Patrick Mallett: Possibly, depends on whether they're a major or minor subdivision.