Browse
Search
9-4-24 PB Agenda Packet
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Agendas
>
2024
>
9-4-24 PB Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2024 11:59:50 AM
Creation date
8/29/2024 11:57:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/4/2024
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
8 <br /> DRAFT <br /> 102 portion there that is designated Rural Residential, which is the zoning that they are <br /> 103 requesting. Looking at the surrounding land uses, all meet that same Rural Residential <br /> 104 type. They are either single-family residential uses or undeveloped land, some with <br /> 105 agriculture. So, requirements from the Conventional District application, they completed <br /> 106 their Zoning Atlas Amendment application. There is a map showing the land proposed for <br /> 107 rezoning that they submitted to us in the form of a plat. They provided us with a narrative <br /> 108 that was detailing their proposed zoning, Future Land Use designation and how it meets <br /> 109 that, and then also it was sent out for any other reviewing agencies. So, with the Rural <br /> 110 Residential zoning district, this is just sort of that card here about it from our ordinance. <br /> 111 The applicant is not required to define the type of development or an anticipated land use. <br /> 112 If approved, all 30 land uses within the Rural Residential zoning district could be possible <br /> 113 if their use standards are able to be met. And then I'm going to turn it over to the <br /> 114 applicant. We have representatives here from Hart's Mill/Common Ground to present <br /> 115 this. <br /> 116 Lucas Babinec: Good evening. I'll be respectful of y'all's time. I know it's valuable. I'm here with Becky <br /> 117 and Doug, our legendary farmer out there. Again, Lauren talked about the land, the <br /> 118 current zoning, and basically our request is happening because the current Master Plan <br /> 119 Zoning is just way too much of a development for what we want to do. When this <br /> 120 happened back in 2015, we weren't aware of the flexible subdivision conservation cluster. <br /> 121 We just found out about that last autumn. So, now that we know that exists and we can <br /> 122 pursue development that's in line with that kind of site plan, we want to revert back to the <br /> 123 R1 so that we can put this overlay zoning on. We're an aspiring eco village intentional <br /> 124 community project. Just living very ecologically. Having a very vibrant farm happening. <br /> 125 Growing a lot of our own food. Lots happened already and a lot of work has happened, <br /> 126 but when COVID began, prices soared, and we weren't able to go through with that <br /> 127 master plan zoning, and so there were a lot of members that left, and in the year since, <br /> 128 we've been trying to regroup. Now, we have this other flexible subdivision option <br /> 129 available, but we have got to revert the zoning to do that. Also, putting the land in a <br /> 130 conservation easement, so very much in line with what wants to happen in this part and <br /> 131 the goals for Orange County. Just more about what's happening with the current one and <br /> 132 why it's not possible for us now. A lot less of the land will be developed with the flexible <br /> 133 subdivision conservation cluster, so that's why we want to revert back. Welcome to any <br /> 134 questions that y'all have about this. Thank you. <br /> 135 Adam Beeman: Steve, any questions? Charity? Chris? Statler? Marilyn? Whitney? Dolores?All right. Do <br /> 136 1 have any motions? <br /> 137 Lauren Coffey: We have a little bit more of our presentation. <br /> 138 Adam Beeman: I mean we were getting it, right, we were going right along. <br /> 139 Lauren Coffey: Just informing you that public notifications were sent out July 24t". Notices were mailed to <br /> 140 all property owners within a thousand feet. We also posted signs on the parcel and on <br /> 141 our web page. So as far as staff analysis, we evaluated that the application met our <br /> 142 requirements from our ordinance, it was consistent with the goals and objective outlined in <br /> 143 Orange County Comprehensive Plan and that the amendment is reasonable and in the <br /> 144 public interest, meets the 20-Year Transition for the Future Land Use Map. So, this is the <br /> 145 step we are at tonight in the review process at the Planning Board. We went over your <br /> 146 role and that you will then make a recommendation to the Board of County <br /> 147 Commissioners. Our recommendation from the Planning Director tonight is to receive the <br /> 148 rezoning application, deliberate on the proposal if you desire, consider the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.