9-4-24 PB Agenda Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

15 DRAFT 395 Patrick Mallett: Where do you stop? I mean, it would keep going and we need to have the process start 396 with the property owner and a surveyor. You have to have a surveyed boundary and a 397 surveyor attesting to the fact that that's the ridge line and it could keep going, we have 398 some adjacent property owners and I think one of them is going to contemplate whether 399 it's worth it for him to go through the same process. It's the property to the south of this 400 one. 401 Lamar Proctor: What's the practical result of moving it in terms of property use? 402 Patrick Mallett: It's simple but nuanced. Simple question with a nuanced answer. I think for larger 403 properties, not too much. In the second case you're going to see it had a direct impact on 404 that property owner and what she wanted to do. In this case, I think it has more to do with 405 the engineer pointing out if there's any development activity on this property or the smaller 406 lot, Lot No. 2 on this survey, there are implications that would apply in terms of impervious 407 to Lot No. 2. Ultimately the land disturbing activity on these properties would require a 408 land disturbance permit, a storm water analysis and so it has more to do with, from the 409 engineer's perspective, in that analysis I want to show pre and post-development, which 410 way the water's breaking and do my analysis accordingly versus running that analysis on 411 an arbitrary line that defies the laws of physics. 412 Lamar Proctor: Got it, thank you. 413 Patrick Mallett: Staff has determined the application is complete, staff reviewed the considerations of the 414 request, and it adheres to the principles of the Orange County 2030 comprehensive plan. 415 We went through the notifications like we would with other rezoning requests, signs, 416 notices, and put it on our website. And this is where we are. We went through planning 417 staff review, the DAC review, comments from other departments, and then this would get 418 referred on like other zoning cases to the board of county commissioners. We 419 recommend that you receive the rezoning application deliberate on the proposals desired, 420 consider the planning director's recommendation and make a recommendation to the 421 BOCC on either a statement of consistency or statement of inconsistency in the proposed 422 attachments. Our hope is to get this before the BOCC in time for September the 5th. The 423 next case, when I stop here you can ask questions about this case, then I can move on to 424 the next one. 425 Adam Beeman: We have two members of the public that want to speak on number 9. 426 Lamar Proctor: Is that the next one? 427 Adam Beeman: This one we're on right now. 428 Jerry Blanchard: I'll decline. All of my questions have already been answered. 429 Adam Beeman: Are you Jerry? 430 Jerry Blanchard: Yes sir. 431 Adam Beeman: The only other member was Frank. 432 Frank Cohen: I also yield my time, Patrick covered everything I had to say. 433 Adam Beeman: All right, perfect. Go ahead Charity.