Agenda - 09-05-2024; 5-c - Zoning Atlas Amendment – 711 Faith Way Road, Mebane, Cheeks Township

Browse Search

32 DRAFT 46 legally have to accept that for permitting purposes, the true ridge line. Her garage, we 47 have signed off on that permit. The mapping that was done is kind of hard to read but it 48 basically corresponds to the previous map. Staff analysis is the application was complete, 49 the staff review, the application is considered request consistent with the Orange County 50 2030 comprehensive plan. The proper notifications were made via mail, sign postings 51 and listed on our active development web page. With the planning board level,just like 52 the other case, would get referred on with a recommendation to the Board of County 53 Commissioners. The planning director recommends to the board to receive the rezoning 54 application delivered on their proposal as desired, consider the planning director's 55 recommendation, and make a recommendation to the BOCC on either the statement of 56 consistency, Attachment 6 or the statement inconsistency, Attachment 7, and the 57 proposed ordinance, Attachment 8 in time for the September 5th, 2024, BOCC meeting. 58 Adam Beeman: Anybody have any questions? 59 Chris Johnston: Does it matter that that line goes all the way down back to the originating line and so that 60 whole side there, does that matter in the slightest? 61 Patrick Mallett: It's the same circumstance. 62 Chris Johnston: I guess that's fair. It would be assumed that it would. 63 Patrick Mallett: The ridge line and the survey went beyond that slightly, but the reality is legally we can 64 amend it on her property, then we take it from there, but either property owner to the north 65 or south, if they felt like it benefited them and there was a need, it's a pretty compelling 66 reason to keep amending that to correspond with the ridge line. 67 Chris Johnston: I guess what I'm saying is this property owner wouldn't need to come back and then move 68 that red line back to the new line because it's along the property line, does that make 69 sense? 70 Patrick Mallett: Yeah, I understand what you're saying, there's no impact on the property owner. It's a 71 mathematical calculation and her impervious limits based on the watershed are based on 72 the amount of area on her property so, you're not going one way or another. 73 Chris Johnston: Okay. Then if the next property owner over gets a survey and finds it matches up to the 74 new line, they don't, the previous property owner doesn't need to come back and revert 75 back the line or anything along those lines, it would just continue on. 76 Patrick Mallett: It would theoretically just pick up where the other one left off. 77 Chris Johnston: Okay, thank you. 78 Adam Beeman: Any other questions? Do I have a motion? 79 Lamar Proctor: I move to adopt the proposed zoning change and adopt the statement of consistency in 80 Attachment 5 and the proposed ordinance and Attachment 6 as consistent with the 81 comprehensive plan and the UDO and recommend approval to the board of county 82 commissioners. 83 Adam Beeman: Do I have a second? 84 Marilyn Carter: Second.