Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-05-2024; 5-b - Zoning Atlas Amendment – Dimmocks Mill Road, Hillsborough, Hillsborough Township
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2020's
>
2024
>
Agenda - 09-05-2024 Business Meeting
>
Agenda - 09-05-2024; 5-b - Zoning Atlas Amendment – Dimmocks Mill Road, Hillsborough, Hillsborough Township
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2024 11:39:54 AM
Creation date
8/29/2024 11:43:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/5/2024
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5-b
Document Relationships
Agenda for September 5, 2024 BOCC Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2024\Agenda - 09-05-2024 Business Meeting
Minutes 09-05-2024 - Business Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2020's\2024
ORD-2024-022-An Ordinance amending the Orange County zoning atlas
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2020-2029\2024
ORD-2024-023-An Ordinance amending the Orange County zoning atlas
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2020-2029\2024
ORD-2024-024-An Ordinance amending the Orange County zoning atlas
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2020-2029\2024
ORD-2024-025-Professional services contract with Development Finance initiative UNC School of Government for pre development services for the greene tract and approval of budget amendment #1-A
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2020-2029\2024
ORD-2024-026-Fiscal Year 2024-25 Budget Amendment #1
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2020-2029\2024
ORD-2024-027-North Carolina Governor highway safety program Orange County Sheriff's Office police traffic services and approval of budget amendment #1-B
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2020-2029\2024
ORD-2024-028-Amendment to the Professional Services Contract with Thomas & Hutton for the Greene Tract Master Plan and Approval of Budget Amendment #1-C
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2020-2029\2024
OTHER-2024-060-Zoning Atlas Amendment – 1031 Frazier Road, Mebane, Cheeks Township
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2020 - 2029\2024
OTHER-2024-061-Zoning Atlas Amendment – Dimmocks Mill Road Hillsborough-Hillsborough Township
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2020 - 2029\2024
OTHER-2024-062-Zoning Atlas Amendment – 711 Faith Way Road, Mebane, Cheeks Township
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2020 - 2029\2024
OTHER-2024-063-Tax Collector’s Annual Settlement for Fiscal Year 2023-24
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2020 - 2029\2024
OTHER-2024-067- Ratification of County Manager’s Execution of a Services Agreement with Priority Dispatch Corporation
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2020 - 2029\2024
RES-2024-042-Refund Release Resolution
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2020-2029\2024
RES-2024-043-Refund Release Resolution
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2020-2029\2024
RES-2024-044-Exemption Exclusion
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2020-2029\2024
RES-2024-045-Resolution approving the tax collectors annual settlement for the current year 2023 and prior years
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2020-2029\2024
RES-2024-046-Resolution authorizing exchange of property
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2020-2029\2024
RES-2024-047-North Carolina Governors Highway safety program local governmental resolution
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2020-2029\2024
RES-2024-048-Major Subdivision Preliminary Plat Application – Stonewall
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2020-2029\2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
46 <br /> DRAFT <br /> 95 BOCC on either a statement of consistency or statement of inconsistency in the proposed <br /> 96 attachments. Our hope is to get this before the BOCC in time for September the 5th. The <br /> 97 next case, when I stop here you can ask questions about this case, then I can move on to <br /> 98 the next one. <br /> 99 Adam Beeman: We have two members of the public that want to speak on number 9. <br /> 100 Lamar Proctor: Is that the next one? <br /> 101 Adam Beeman: This one we're on right now. <br /> 102 Jerry Blanchard: I'll decline.All of my questions have already been answered. <br /> 103 Adam Beeman: Are you Jerry? <br /> 104 Jerry Blanchard: Yes sir. <br /> 105 Adam Beeman: The only other member was Frank. <br /> 106 Frank Cohen: I also yield my time, Patrick covered everything I had to say. <br /> 107 Adam Beeman: All right, perfect. Go ahead Charity. <br /> 108 Charity Kirk: Clarifying Lamar's last question, the benefit of moving it is for future development <br /> 109 purposes and it's better that it's in one watershed versus the critical watershed. But this is <br /> 110 the correct boundary. <br /> 111 Lamar Proctor: That's right, from the surveying perspective, from a reality perspective and quite honestly, <br /> 112 the way that this works, they're entitled to that ridge line that was adopted by the county <br /> 113 commissioners and affirmed by the state, so this has more to do with helping staff not <br /> 114 have an inconsistency between the boundary line and an action that's already been taken. <br /> 115 Charity Kirk: But we can just change the line without surveying every single property along it. Okay. <br /> 116 Patrick Mallett: It unfortunately needs to be on a case-by-case basis as requested. We do provide some <br /> 117 relief to the property owner in the sense that this is more of our issue on the zoning <br /> 118 amendment of the overlay and it's a staff-initiated zoning. We're not asking them to pay <br /> 119 for what boils down to a mapping need. <br /> 120 Lamar Proctor: And I interpret your response and your answer to mean that effectively you help property <br /> 121 owners in terms of not creating some weirdly inconsistent engineering requirements for an <br /> 122 arbitrary line that doesn't follow the realities of water flow and would create headaches in <br /> 123 terms of civil engineering of any development on that particular parcel. <br /> 124 Patrick Mallett: Yes. <br /> 125 Chris Johnston: When we have a new applicant that comes before us, do they also have the survey team <br /> 126 go out to check and see where the water line actually is. <br /> 127 Patrick Mallett: That's what happened. Prior to the zoning or that train leaving the station. <br /> 128 Chris Johnston: So, any new development that comes before us is going to amend that little line. <br /> 129 Patrick Mallett: Record it as surveyors attesting that is the true ridge line. And then we notify the state and <br /> 130 then it goes to the county commissioners on an agenda so that they can receive that <br /> 131 information and accept it. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.