Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-05-2024; 5-b - Zoning Atlas Amendment – Dimmocks Mill Road, Hillsborough, Hillsborough Township
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2020's
>
2024
>
Agenda - 09-05-2024 Business Meeting
>
Agenda - 09-05-2024; 5-b - Zoning Atlas Amendment – Dimmocks Mill Road, Hillsborough, Hillsborough Township
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2024 11:39:54 AM
Creation date
8/29/2024 11:43:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/5/2024
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5-b
Document Relationships
Agenda for September 5, 2024 BOCC Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2024\Agenda - 09-05-2024 Business Meeting
Minutes 09-05-2024 - Business Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2020's\2024
ORD-2024-022-An Ordinance amending the Orange County zoning atlas
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2020-2029\2024
ORD-2024-023-An Ordinance amending the Orange County zoning atlas
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2020-2029\2024
ORD-2024-024-An Ordinance amending the Orange County zoning atlas
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2020-2029\2024
ORD-2024-025-Professional services contract with Development Finance initiative UNC School of Government for pre development services for the greene tract and approval of budget amendment #1-A
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2020-2029\2024
ORD-2024-026-Fiscal Year 2024-25 Budget Amendment #1
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2020-2029\2024
ORD-2024-027-North Carolina Governor highway safety program Orange County Sheriff's Office police traffic services and approval of budget amendment #1-B
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2020-2029\2024
ORD-2024-028-Amendment to the Professional Services Contract with Thomas & Hutton for the Greene Tract Master Plan and Approval of Budget Amendment #1-C
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2020-2029\2024
OTHER-2024-060-Zoning Atlas Amendment – 1031 Frazier Road, Mebane, Cheeks Township
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2020 - 2029\2024
OTHER-2024-061-Zoning Atlas Amendment – Dimmocks Mill Road Hillsborough-Hillsborough Township
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2020 - 2029\2024
OTHER-2024-062-Zoning Atlas Amendment – 711 Faith Way Road, Mebane, Cheeks Township
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2020 - 2029\2024
OTHER-2024-063-Tax Collector’s Annual Settlement for Fiscal Year 2023-24
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2020 - 2029\2024
OTHER-2024-067- Ratification of County Manager’s Execution of a Services Agreement with Priority Dispatch Corporation
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2020 - 2029\2024
RES-2024-042-Refund Release Resolution
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2020-2029\2024
RES-2024-043-Refund Release Resolution
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2020-2029\2024
RES-2024-044-Exemption Exclusion
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2020-2029\2024
RES-2024-045-Resolution approving the tax collectors annual settlement for the current year 2023 and prior years
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2020-2029\2024
RES-2024-046-Resolution authorizing exchange of property
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2020-2029\2024
RES-2024-047-North Carolina Governors Highway safety program local governmental resolution
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2020-2029\2024
RES-2024-048-Major Subdivision Preliminary Plat Application – Stonewall
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2020-2029\2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
45 <br /> DRAFT <br /> 50 zoning overlay, they're not requesting and we're not requesting to change the zoning <br /> 51 districts, it would still be rural residential R1, it would just change the boundary and the <br /> 52 distinction between what is in the Upper Eno Critical watershed and the Lower Eno. <br /> 53 Future land use designation, agricultural residential, rural residential on the 10-year <br /> 54 transition. Our request is to modify that boundary to the area in pink. It only applies, you <br /> 55 see an odd jog, the reason being is this property owner applied for that boundary <br /> 56 amendment and then went through the process with the state and that, prior to getting <br /> 57 here, included a petition by the property owner to us with a survey indicating, with a <br /> 58 registered surveyor's seal, recorded this is the ridge line I'm certifying that this is the ridge <br /> 59 line that's been recorded. We notified the state about that request. We also notified the <br /> 60 Board of County Commissioners, they received that request, it was then passed on to the <br /> 61 state and then passed on to the EMC. The state has acknowledged that boundary <br /> 62 change so as far as the state is concerned, that pink line is the ridge line. We're going <br /> 63 through the semantics of quite honestly just amending our overlay district to correspond <br /> 64 with that line. <br /> 65 Lamar Proctor: I had a quick question. <br /> 66 Patrick Mallett: Sure. <br /> 67 Lamar Proctor: Why just this property, why not the adjoining parcels and make it correct all the way <br /> 68 through? <br /> 69 Patrick Mallett: Where do you stop? I mean, it would keep going and we need to have the process start <br /> 70 with the property owner and a surveyor. You have to have a surveyed boundary and a <br /> 71 surveyor attesting to the fact that that's the ridge line and it could keep going, we have <br /> 72 some adjacent property owners and I think one of them is going to contemplate whether <br /> 73 it's worth it for him to go through the same process. It's the property to the south of this <br /> 74 one. <br /> 75 Lamar Proctor: What's the practical result of moving it in terms of property use? <br /> 76 Patrick Mallett: It's simple but nuanced. Simple question with a nuanced answer. I think for larger <br /> 77 properties, not too much. In the second case you're going to see it had a direct impact on <br /> 78 that property owner and what she wanted to do. In this case, I think it has more to do with <br /> 79 the engineer pointing out if there's any development activity on this property or the smaller <br /> 80 lot, Lot No. 2 on this survey, there are implications that would apply in terms of impervious <br /> 81 to Lot No. 2. Ultimately the land disturbing activity on these properties would require a <br /> 82 land disturbance permit, a storm water analysis and so it has more to do with, from the <br /> 83 engineer's perspective, in that analysis I want to show pre and post-development, which <br /> 84 way the water's breaking and do my analysis accordingly versus running that analysis on <br /> 85 an arbitrary line that defies the laws of physics. <br /> 86 Lamar Proctor: Got it, thank you. <br /> 87 Patrick Mallett: Staff has determined the application is complete, staff reviewed the considerations of the <br /> 88 request, and it adheres to the principles of the Orange County 2030 comprehensive plan. <br /> 89 We went through the notifications like we would with other rezoning requests, signs, <br /> 90 notices, and put it on our website. And this is where we are. We went through planning <br /> 91 staff review, the DAC review, comments from other departments, and then this would get <br /> 92 referred on like other zoning cases to the board of county commissioners. We <br /> 93 recommend that you receive the rezoning application deliberate on the proposals desired, <br /> 94 consider the planning director's recommendation and make a recommendation to the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.