Browse
Search
08.19.2024 OUTboard
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange Unified Transportation Board
>
Agendas
>
2024
>
08.19.2024 OUTboard
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2024 4:07:04 PM
Creation date
8/16/2024 3:56:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/19/2024
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
193
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
47 N. Trivedi: If the conditional show the approved developments meet or exceed the projects in the current <br /> 48 plan,then update, correct? <br /> 49 <br /> 50 J. Mayo:Yes <br /> 51 <br /> 52 S. Appel: Will this work be done by a consultant and or would this work be done by an outside or inside <br /> 53 source? I think it would be beneficial to separate. <br /> 54 <br /> 55 N.Trivedi:We can use our on-call consultant WSP, so you can have a professional product over an in-house <br /> 56 one.WSP can complete the analysis and compare the initial analysis. <br /> 57 <br /> 58 J. Mayo: It was ok for the consultant, it would make sense. The preference would be to do an analysis. <br /> 59 Running a TIA is different from running a plan update.The plan update is the goal. I don't know if you want to <br /> 60 use your on-call for a TIA review. <br /> 61 <br /> 62 N. Trivedi: Have WSP complete task A and then present the findings to the OUTboard and then this <br /> 63 determines if we want to proceed with the rest,correct?The original 2019 adopted plan,the pods were based <br /> 64 on a geographic, not the parcel by parcel or development by development,they were grouped together.The <br /> 65 development that was approved may not be the full development.We will confirm if the overall total of the <br /> 66 development is either at the 2019 projections, below or above the requiring changes. <br /> 67 <br /> 68 A. Menius: Motion to analyze existing conditions will be undertaken for the Efland Buckhorn-Mebane Access <br /> 69 Management Plan updated and the results of the study will be used by the OUTboard to determine whether <br /> 70 to proceed with the plan update. <br /> 71 <br /> 72 Motion:Art Menius Second: Josh Mayo Vote: Unanimous <br /> 73 <br /> 74 5.c.2055 Metropolitan Transportation Plan Update(MTP) <br /> 75 <br /> 76 N.Trivedi:The goal is to receive your feedback,comments,or concerns so I can provide it to the DCHC MPO.. <br /> 77 <br /> 78 S.Appel: Is this just an FYI situation or when would address this again? <br /> 79 <br /> 80 N. Trivedi: Requesting your comments on the goals and objectives right now. The planning process is two <br /> 81 years and we are one year into the process including public engagement. <br /> 82 <br /> 83 5.d. RAISE Grant <br /> 84 N.Trivedi presented the RAISE grant and requested OUTBoard authorization staff to pursue grant application <br /> 85 for three potential projects using WSP on-call services. OUTBoard recommended staff pursue the Regional <br /> 86 Multimodal Hub in Hillsborough as the primary project. <br /> 87 <br /> 88 AGENDA ITEM 6:STAFF REPORT/UPDATES <br /> 89 <br /> 90 6.a. MPO, RPO, &NCDOT Updates <br /> 91 <br /> 92 6.b. County Bike/Pedestrian Plan <br /> 93 N.Trivedi updated OUTBoard that Stantac was selected to do the County's first Bike/Ped Plan. <br /> 94 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.