Browse
Search
8-7-24 PB Agenda Packet
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Agendas
>
2024
>
8-7-24 PB Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2024 9:25:48 AM
Creation date
8/1/2024 9:15:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/7/2024
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
232
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
42 <br /> 1799 Chris Johnston: I would make a motion, and this is to put a flag up. The motion is to reject the three <br /> 1800 agenda items as presented and submit to the County Commissioners as such. <br /> 1801 <br /> 1802 Statler GiIfillen: Will second that. <br /> 1803 <br /> 1804 Beth Bronson: Each one of these needs to be an individual motion? <br /> 1805 <br /> 1806 Adam Beeman: Perdita is going to clarify for us. <br /> 1807 <br /> 1808 Perdita Holtz: It would be good if you could do three separate motions, and if you could use the words <br /> 1809 approve or deny instead of reject. <br /> 1810 <br /> 1811 Chris Johnston: Okay. I make a motion to deny Agenda Item 7 and submit that to the Board of County <br /> 1812 Commissioners. <br /> 1813 <br /> 1814 Statler GiIfillen: Second that. <br /> 1815 <br /> 1816 Chris Johnston: All of these seemed tied together, so,just to confirm, we're doing this three separate <br /> 1817 times? <br /> 1818 <br /> 1819 Perdita Holtz: You need to, for a couple of them state why you're doing it, not for the comp plan, but for <br /> 1820 the rezoning. You have to state why you're doing it. There's a statement of consistency <br /> 1821 and such. <br /> 1822 <br /> 1823 Chris Johnston: Sure. Of course. <br /> 1824 <br /> 1825 Beth Bronson: So, before you finish with that motion, because I think you're on the right track, I would <br /> 1826 like to make a motion to extend the meeting time. Like 15 minutes, if needed be, up to <br /> 1827 10:30. Just making sure because we have three different motions to go through. <br /> 1828 <br /> 1829 Chris Johnston: I was planning on doing all three in tandem because I think all three of them depend on <br /> 1830 each other. <br /> 1831 <br /> 1832 Adam Beeman: If we get to 10:00 here we'll vote on a push out. <br /> 1833 <br /> 1834 Patrick Mallett: Just to clarify, we'll do them in succession, but they're different applications that have <br /> 1835 different case numbers, so we could do them in rapid succession, but they really do need <br /> 1836 to be three separate items. And 'its approval or denial on all, as Perdita said, on the <br /> 1837 zoning case, you need to have a statement of inconsistency or consistency. <br /> 1838 <br /> 1839 Chris Johnston: Lamar, would you mind handling that now?You are so much better at this than I am. <br /> 1840 <br /> 1841 Patrick Mallett: You need to articulate why. <br /> 1842 <br /> 1843 Adam Beeman: We'll start with 7. <br /> 1844 <br /> 1845 Lamar Proctor: Does 7 need a statement of inconsistency? <br /> 1846 <br /> 1847 Perdita Holtz: No, it does not. <br /> 1848 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.