Browse
Search
8-7-24 PB Agenda Packet
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Agendas
>
2024
>
8-7-24 PB Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2024 9:25:48 AM
Creation date
8/1/2024 9:15:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/7/2024
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
232
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
35 <br /> 1451 <br /> 1452 Chris Johnston: And I apologize, could you,just for my own personal clarification, break it out a little bit <br /> 1453 more so that star specifically means that we need to... <br /> 1454 <br /> 1455 Perdita Holtz: The star in the table of permitted uses means that it's a permitted use. When you get to <br /> 1456 the conditional districts, what it means is that it's a use that can be applied for as part of a <br /> 1457 conditional district. So, it would just mean that somebody can apply for that to get <br /> 1458 approved as part of their conditional district application. <br /> 1459 <br /> 1460 Charity Kirk: Can we approve just that Amendment 1 in Item 8, right now? <br /> 1461 <br /> 1462 Perdita Holtz: You could recommend that that go forward if you didn't want to approve the other parts. <br /> 1463 <br /> 1464 Charity Kirk: Do we have to do them together or can we just get that done with right now? <br /> 1465 <br /> 1466 Perdita Holtz: It would probably be unlikely since this is a bundled application that staff is going to just <br /> 1467 take forward one thing that's not part of this whole bundle of applications. We'll come <br /> 1468 back in the fall with this one amendment if things did not go forward at this point. <br /> 1469 <br /> 1470 Chris Johnston: I apologize, I just hate arguing about things that we don't have any control over, that's <br /> 1471 what I want to make sure that we're not doing necessarily, like if this is something that is a <br /> 1472 state regulation. <br /> 1473 <br /> 1474 Perdita Holtz: I would recommend that you not take out just that one part. We'll come back with a text <br /> 1475 amendment, if necessary, in the future. <br /> 1476 <br /> 1477 Adam Beeman: Any other questions or concerns? <br /> 1478 <br /> 1479 Chris Johnston: I have general thoughts and comments and that sort of thing, but are we at the point <br /> 1480 where we're summarizing our thoughts or are we still asking questions of the public? <br /> 1481 <br /> 1482 Adam Beeman: I mean, we're looking for a motion so if you're ready for a motion or someone wants to <br /> 1483 discuss things, let's have it. <br /> 1484 <br /> 1485 Chris Johnston: I'm still putting together Agenda Item 8 and I apologize, I thought that that was a little bit <br /> 1486 more bundled than it turned out it was, so I need to do a little bit of additional digging <br /> 1487 there. In regards to Agenda Item 7, which is essentially growing the pink dot, right? <br /> 1488 We're talking about expanding the rural neighborhood activity node. That makes sense <br /> 1489 based on the comments that were brought before by the previous planning board,why <br /> 1490 they didn't do it by parcels, that makes complete sense now. They didn't do it by parcels <br /> 1491 because, and if I misunderstand, I apologize, but they didn't do it by parcels because if <br /> 1492 they did then there would be no growth, it would just be whoever is there is there, so this <br /> 1493 makes sense in that regard insomuch as if someone comes in, they may be outside that <br /> 1494 dot, extending it makes sense to make it in compliance or whatever the case may be. If <br /> 1495 I'm misunderstanding that also, please correct me. But the key question here on is <br /> 1496 Agenda Item 9, right? Agenda Item 9 is the proposal by the applicant, and I think that <br /> 1497 everyone agrees with what Fiddlehead is trying to do there, they are trying to age in place, <br /> 1498 they want a community of like-minded individuals who have kind of fun with their <br /> 1499 neighbors, they can grow together and have that community, and I think that community <br /> 1500 actually in some ways already exists at Morrow Mill, right. There are people there who <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.