Orange County NC Website
23 <br /> 852 need to slow down traffic to, I don't know, 15 miles in that area. So, all this entry and <br /> 853 exiting of people will not hit, , I don't want to have so many crashes in my front yard. And <br /> 854 it's going to impact my neighbor, Chelsea. She has five kids and they want to put an entry <br /> 855 and exit right in her gate. I'm not comfortable with that, I'm not too happy with that, <br /> 856 especially if she has the young special child, and I think this has to be reviewed and entry <br /> 857 and exit has to be on Gold Mine Loop, not on Morrow Mill Road because it's going to <br /> 858 create lots of crashes. <br /> 859 <br /> 860 Carol Mellon: I'm Carol Mellon, I live at 6410 Goldmine Loop with my husband Jim, and I just wanted to <br /> 861 say that our area is not zoned for high density development. We purchased our property <br /> 862 with existing zoning in mind because we desire to live in a rural area with a rural lifestyle <br /> 863 away from the noise, pollution, and congestion that we have experienced living in cities or <br /> 864 suburbs. Some of neighbors continue to find properties that their families have owned for <br /> 865 generations. We do not need another rural Fearrington Village type development in our <br /> 866 area or yet another party barn or entertainment venue with events disruptive to the lives of <br /> 867 nearby residents. Nor do we need a multistory apartment building. That's just out of <br /> 868 character with our area. And I would just like to say that most of us, even those of us who <br /> 869 are newcomers, bought properties that were appropriately zoned for our own plans and <br /> 870 now the applicant comes in and wants to change the character of the neighborhood and <br /> 871 we feel that that's unfair and we hope that you will reject their proposal, thank you. <br /> 872 <br /> 873 John Kizer: John Kizer is my first name, but Steve Kizer is what I go by. And my home and property <br /> 874 are located about 600 yards from the proposed urban development. At the last meeting, <br /> 875 several board members wondered what the original framers of the land use plan, zoning <br /> 876 ordinances were thinking specifically about the contour of the rural nodes. I'm standing <br /> 877 here as a relic of that time. I was chairman of the board of adjustment and a member of <br /> 878 the planning board when they put zoning in place in Orange County, and at that time, we <br /> 879 developed the land use plan with several considerations. For example, the rural nodes <br /> 880 that you asked about, had we followed the parcel boundaries in defining the nodes, we <br /> 881 would have codified a commercial monopoly on a select few properties, an outcome that <br /> 882 neither we nor the community desired. The nodes were circular to provide a crude area to <br /> 883 which we could apply the principal zoning, avoiding any preference to a given landowner. <br /> 884 The philosophy charged to us by the county commissioners in those days of developing <br /> 885 the zoning ordinance was twofold. Number one, prevent urban sprawl and direct intense <br /> 886 urban development to the cities of Hillsborough and Chapel Hill where urban services and <br /> 887 utilities were available. Preserve the rural character of the county and prevent strip <br /> 888 development, that was threatening transportation quarters in and out of the county. As an <br /> 889 incentive, the selling of zoning to a wary and skeptical county population was based on <br /> 890 the promise that once enacted and approved, exceptions and variances to the ordinance <br /> 891 would be few and difficult to obtain. Thereby providing permanence to the county <br /> 892 structure. I have a few comments about the proposed project. Number one, water. The <br /> 893 proposal lists a minimum of 150 living units. According to the EPA, the average water <br /> 894 usage per day for an adult is about 85 to 100 Gallons. Assuming two persons per living <br /> 895 unit, the daily water needs of this development would be upwards of 30,000 gallons of <br /> 896 water a day. At the meeting, it was stated a well on the property could produce 40 gallons <br /> 897 per minute. This is an unrealistic estimate. And notwithstanding, it is not plausible that <br /> 898 one could pump 30,000 gallons daily from this relatively small parcel of land. In our area <br /> 899 wells usually produce no more than 5 to 6 gallons per minute; moreover, wells also run <br /> 900 dry in drought conditions in our area. For example, several years ago my neighbor had to <br /> 901 sell off his dairy herd as his wells ran dry. Wastewater, number two, assuming a closed <br />