Orange County NC Website
20 <br /> 702 To grant the developer their proposed changes would be to rob the neighbors, as well as <br /> 703 Orange County more broadly, of our vision for our own growth by circumventing the land <br /> 704 use plan process. It would negatively impact the ability of Morrow Mill and Goldmine <br /> 705 residents to build the future that serves our collective needs. It would shake the trust in <br /> 706 County procedure if a developer were able to usher in such significant policy changes that <br /> 707 are so inconsistent with the surrounding area and county-wide goals. The scale and <br /> 708 location of this proposal is not in line with the 2050 Land Use Plan with current County <br /> 709 policies and ordinances and isn't worth jeopardizing our natural resources over. I ask you <br /> 710 to please vote against recommending. Thank you. <br /> 711 <br /> 712 Gregory Rapp: Hi, my name is Gregory Rapp. At the start of last month's meeting, we were told by the <br /> 713 planning director that, quote, "The MPD-CD zoning district was originally established to be <br /> 714 a mechanism through which innovative proposals could be considered. Innovation, <br /> 715 essentially, is the key that unlocks the door to overriding established zoning rules." I was <br /> 716 expecting the next sentence to be something like we, the planning staff, believe this <br /> 717 project to be innovative because of A, B, C and D, but we just sort of moved on as if it was <br /> 718 assumed that this project must be innovative. I looked for anything in the application that <br /> 719 spoke to this but found nothing. So, what do we see in the application? We see an <br /> 720 applicant that is seeking to upend decades of thoughtful planning for a self-serving <br /> 721 subdivision; an applicant who has professed no experience in the fields of real estate <br /> 722 development, real estate management, senior care, water management, or sewage <br /> 723 management. If approved, this would be their very first development. This applicant is <br /> 724 asking to build 150 units, the largest development in the history of the county, without any <br /> 725 legitimate justification for this outlandish scale; an applicant who has been planning an <br /> 726 intentional community for over a decade and still can't make their intentions clear. Their <br /> 727 application targets seniors as their primary audience without mention of any other type of <br /> 728 residents; no families, no children, no teens, while at the same time, their articles of <br /> 729 incorporation registered a year prior with the secretary of state say their development will <br /> 730 be multi-generational with no mention there at all of seniors or aging and, now, tonight, we <br /> 731 just learned that it's a 55 and up residential development. So, we're not sure what it is. <br /> 732 An applicant who may not know that the banks don't write mortgages for cooperative <br /> 733 homes. Since the residents don't own their homes, there's no collateral for the bank. Any <br /> 734 resident would have to pay in full, up front, putting this out of reach for people of modest <br /> 735 means and making affordability pure fantasy. An applicant who was unable to articulate <br /> 736 the membership criteria for their cooperative, let alone how a resident could cash out. <br /> 737 You can't sell your place on the open market because the cooperative owns your home. <br /> 738 You would have to wait until all of the other members agree to admit a new member. <br /> 739 What is the cooperative's obligation to even let you leave? And, even if they let you <br /> 740 leave, how will they calculate the value of your membership? To my ears, this sounds like <br /> 741 a financial trap, and it frightens me to think of how this could play out for seniors or any of <br /> 742 our aging loved ones whose health status and needs can change overnight. There's <br /> 743 nothing new about targeting a vulnerable group. Is this the kind of innovation the planning <br /> 744 department has in mind? Is this the kind of innovation that opens the door to sweeping <br /> 745 zoning changes? I, for one, certainly hope it is not. Thank you. <br /> 746 <br /> 747 Betty Lou Whitford: Good evening. My name is Betty Lou Whitford. I'm a Hands Four co-op member. I <br /> 748 want to emphasize just one aspect of Fiddlehead Corner, so it isn't overshadowed by the <br /> 749 complexities of the zoning proposal. That aspect is how Fiddlehead Corner can be a <br /> 750 leading-edge model for Orange County, one that is right within your grasp. To appreciate <br /> 751 its importance as a model, one only need picture conventional subdivision development. <br />