Browse
Search
07.18.2024 OUTboard
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange Unified Transportation Board
>
Agendas
>
2024
>
07.18.2024 OUTboard
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/19/2024 5:05:42 PM
Creation date
7/19/2024 5:05:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
7/18/2024
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
507 <br /> 508 M. Hughes: My perspective would be to wait until the 15th. <br /> 509 <br /> 510 N. Trivedi: Yeah, as much mine. <br /> 511 <br /> 512 L. Triebert: Yep, OK. <br /> 513 <br /> 514 N. Trivedi: And one thing that one thing just to give you an example of a contingent approval is the NC <br /> 515 54 core board study that has been approved to give you an example of how effective a conditional <br /> 516 approval is. Here's an example of how effective it is, and this has been proven because I've got it done <br /> 517 with a confirmation from DOT confirming this. The approval of the Multimodal corridor study like 54, was <br /> 518 approved on the condition that the complete streets and multimodal accommodations be included in any <br /> 519 roadway improvement. DOT came back with a preliminary courtesy Complete Streets review of that <br /> 520 approval, even though it's not a program project, even though it's not in the STIP, it's <br /> 521 going through a scoring process right now, DOT has written back with a preliminary courtesy complete <br /> 522 street review that any how improvements on 54 will include non-highway improvements paid by the state. <br /> 523 <br /> 524 L. Triebert: Yeah, and I can speak a little further to that cause one of the other contracts that I work on <br /> 525 and run for our firm is the DOT Express design contract, which is basically the process that DOT uses to <br /> 526 get planning-level project-specific cost estimates that help with prioritization. And I happen to we VHB is <br /> 527 doing the 54 express design and it does have those accommodations included in the design and the cost <br /> 528 and that is because those uh those facilities and accommodations are included in planning documents. <br /> 529 And so now the inner integrated Mobility division does a review and makes sure that projects moving <br /> 530 forward are inclusive of those types of complete street elements. <br /> 531 <br /> 532 L. Triebert: Well, it sounds like we've got several action items in this to follow up with on you. Just digging <br /> 533 a little deeper into some data and graphics to answer some of these questions that you'll will be able to <br /> 534 present at the 15th meeting. <br /> 535 <br /> 536 N. Trivedi: Thank you everybody at the OUTBoard for participating in this. <br /> 537 <br /> 538 S. Appel: Is it possible for you to put together whatever kind of question, answer, reference, document, <br /> 539 PowerPoint or something like that that we can look at beforehand and then give you any follow-up <br /> 540 questions before that meeting so that we can have an expedited meeting for this? <br /> 541 <br /> 542 L. Triebert: I'll see, you know, within the next two weeks, there's just three weeks, but I think we've got a <br /> 543 lot of the information available. It's just a matter of like putting it together. I want to follow this meeting up <br /> 544 with an email that outlines the questions that need to get answered and then present the answers to <br /> 545 those you know and getting follow-up will kind of be time-dependent on what we can get done before the <br /> 546 15th. <br /> 547 <br /> 548 Members gave their salutations and the meeting was adjourned. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.