Browse
Search
7.24.24 BOA Agenda Packet
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Board of Adjustment
>
Agendas
>
2024
>
7.24.24 BOA Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/19/2024 4:59:46 PM
Creation date
7/19/2024 3:59:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
7/24/2024
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
237
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Leon Meyers: No. It is the area that's shaded on this map. 1 <br /> 2 <br />Beth Bronson: Only the one that they've indicated. Okay. 3 <br /> 4 <br />Leon Meyers: Do I hear a motion to that effect? 5 <br /> 6 <br />Beth Bronson: So again, I would have to make a motion to – I don't feel comfortable making a motion because I don't 7 <br />have enough information – 8 <br /> 9 <br />Leon Meyers: I understand. 10 <br /> 11 <br />Beth Bronson: – how I would like to proceed or how I would describe my concerns with it or if there should be any other 12 <br />conditions on that special use permit, and that said, I'm not going to bring forth a motion to approve. 13 <br /> 14 <br />Leon Meyers: Right. Understood. Anybody have questions? It seems like the next step would be a motion to approve. 15 <br /> 16 <br />Jeff Scott: I would say that I'm inclined to make the motion to approve. I think that from your comments, Beth, and 17 <br />then the commentary that Nathan has is that there is confusion about that boundary line, but I think that Mr. Bryan was 18 <br />helped in clarifying that, and I think part of the issue, too, is that there is a lot of information here about something that 19 <br />we're making determination on, so that makes things more confusing in the sense of we're trying to make this decision 20 <br />on the SUP and the unity issue, and from what I've seen is that it meets that. I understand the concerns that you've got, 21 <br />Nathan and Beth, but I don't see it holding up making a motion. 22 <br /> 23 <br />Nathan Robinson: There's no offense. Just this is where I am. 24 <br /> 25 <br />Jeff Scott: No, I get it. 26 <br /> 27 <br />Leon Meyers: So was that a motion to approve with the conditions, the four listed conditions. 28 <br /> 29 <br />Jeff Scott: Yes. would make a motion to approve with the conditions as noted. 30 <br /> 31 <br />Leon Meyers: Okay. And is there a second to that motion? Motion on the floor is to approve the special use permit 32 <br />based on the findings of fact and the conclusions that the Board has already approved with the four conditions listed in 33 <br />the agenda package plus the additional condition related to dedicating open space. Just need a second to that motion. 34 <br /> 35 <br />Beth Bronson: I second that motion. 36 <br /> 37 <br />Leon Meyers: Okay. And discussion on the motion? No discussion. Then all in favor of issuing the special use permit 38 <br />as the motion describes, please say aye. Aye. Any opposed? 39 <br /> 40 <br />MOTION made by Jeff Scott to approve. Seconded by Beth Bronson 41 VOTE: 3-2 (Nathan Robinson and Beth Bronson opposed) 42 <br /> 43 <br />Leon Meyers: Motion carries three to two. We have one other item on the agenda that I skipped over at the beginning, 44 <br />and that is- 45 <br /> 46 <br />Cy Stober: Mr. Chair. Could you close the public hearing, please? 47 <br /> 48 <br />Leon Meyers: Sorry. Motion to close the public hearing. 49 <br /> 50 <br />46
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.