7.24.24 BOA Agenda Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

comments that we've received are strictly that, a courtesy review. Different from the COCA, JPA in our local agreement 1 with Town of Chapel Hill and Town of Carrboro, does require a courtesy review because part of this property is within the 2 rural buffer. I wonder if, Cy, you would add any clarification to that? 3 4 Cy Stober: We received courtesy comments from Town of Chapel Hill per the JPA, and they're in your packet. 5 6 Beth Bronson: Thank you. 7 8 Cy Stober: I would only add that as constructed, and to your point, Ms. Bronson, the 20-30 comprehensive plan is 9 our adopted comprehensive plan consistent with North Carolina General Statute 160D and the plan we consult when we 10 are making plan consistency statements. To date, the COCA and the JPA are both agreements on land use that we have 11 with other jurisdictions and to date, sit outside of our comprehensive plan, but we do reference them, and we do note 12 conformity with them and consistency with them in all of our findings. 13 14 Beth Bronson: Not speaking to the credibility of these maps or the legitimacy of these maps at all. I think I want to just 15 clarify for the record that what we're talking about are these coordinated area land use plans versus the county's 16 comprehensive land use plans. Don't want them being interchanged. 17 18 Nathan Robinson: I have a quick, in relation to that, when I'm looking at the zoning right now for Orange County, it 19 shows Hillsborough zoning where the hospital is, right? And then what is, and what is this zone, then? 20 21 Taylor Perschau: This property is zoned rural residential. 22 23 Nathan Robinson: Not a mixed residential neighborhood. Is there a difference? Am I talking about two different 24 things? 25 26 Taylor Perschau: So, there have been two different things talked about tonight. The thing that it is within the 27 purview of the Orange County Board of Adjustment is the major modification to the two conditions of the existing special 28 use permit. So, that's unitary ownership and relocation of common open space. The applicant has provided the why of 29 why they are bringing this modification request to you. The why does involve requests that are not before the Board of 30 Adjustment but are, I understand, are before the town of Hillsborough. So, when you hear mixed use development, and 31 kind of the talk about the future development, those are applications not under review or even within Orange County 32 jurisdiction. Does that answer your question? 33 34 Nathan Robinson: I think so. I'm confused on a lot of things right here. 35 36 Taylor Perschau: Sure. 37 38 Nathan Robinson: I'm confused because what was presented is that this was a mixed, in the Orange, it shows a 39 mixed residential neighborhood. 40 41 Taylor Perschau: Oh, I see, on the COCA. 42 43 Nathan Robinson And the motivation for me to approve this is, is to say this is a mixed residential neighborhood, 44 therefore it's in conformance and everything. But then I hear you say it's zoned as rural residential. And I don't think, are 45 those the same, or are they different? 46 47 Taylor Perschau: Rural residential is the Orange County zoning district. 48 49 Nathan Robinson: Okay. 50 36