Browse
Search
7.24.24 BOA Agenda Packet
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Board of Adjustment
>
Agendas
>
2024
>
7.24.24 BOA Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/19/2024 4:59:46 PM
Creation date
7/19/2024 3:59:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
7/24/2024
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
237
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
relates to homes that are sold with residential development close by. Based upon these studies and the analysis, it is 1 <br />my conclusion and professional opinion that the proposed modification of the special use permit would have no adverse 2 <br />impact on property demand or values. The proposed modification would have no adverse impact on the marketability of 3 <br />the surrounding properties based upon this market study and the analysis. This proposed modification is in harmony with 4 <br />the surrounding neighborhood. This proposed modification would maintain or enhance property values and marketability. 5 <br />The proposed distribution of the land use to move the open space to align with other open space creeks, natural areas, 6 <br />would improve and provide better buffer protection for the existing homes on Scarlett Mountain Road. Based upon the 7 <br />data provided, and the testimony presented, it is my professional opinion that the applicant has met all the requirements 8 <br />and standards of the UDO for you to vote for approval of the modification. I'm open for any questions. 9 <br /> 10 <br />Leon Meyers: Questions for Mr. Martin? Thank you sir. 11 <br /> 12 <br />Beth Bronson: I’m sorry, I have one question. All those market analyses, the average comparisons, what was the 13 <br />average parcel size? 14 <br />Jarvis Martin: I’m sorry. 15 <br /> 16 <br />Beth Bronson: For the case, like the comp evaluations, for 1500 Allen and the Poplar Lane, the development area in 17 <br />the market study, that was developed, what was that average parcel size? 18 <br /> 19 <br />Leon Meyers: Okay, hold on just a second. 20 <br /> 21 <br />Beth Bronson: I guess it would be the size of the Ramsley community. 22 <br /> 23 <br />Jarvis martin: I don't think we included it for Allen, but on Scarlett - yeah, go ahead. 24 <br /> 25 <br />Walter Snowden: That was not really addressed, simply because of how the research was developed. 26 <br /> 27 <br />Leon Meyers: Excuse me, sir could you identify yourself? 28 <br /> 29 <br />Walter Snowden: My name is Walter Snowden. I am a real estate appraiser. 30 <br /> 31 <br />Leon Meyers: Thank you. 32 <br /> 33 <br />Jarvis Martin: And Walter assisted with some of the research on this project. 34 <br /> 35 <br />Leon Meyers: I understand. 36 <br /> 37 <br />Walter Snowden: How the process was developed, first I looked at things that actually were similar to what was 38 <br />on East Scarlett Mountain Road. Those parcels were 5, 10 acres, 15 acres. So, establishing that, because we wanted 39 <br />like for like, so that way we could really get an understanding of how it would impact a house on a private road with 40 <br />different expectations than something that's in a neighborhood that only has a quarter acre lot. So, there's not an 41 <br />average, because I looked at specific segments, and then went out to a broader market and because we aggregated 42 <br />the data, we kept the individual characteristics for each study, but I didn't necessarily combine it, because it would be 43 <br />like comparing apples to oranges, because it was just too much data. 44 <br /> 45 <br />Jarvis Martin: But the property on poplar lane, it is 10.48 acres, and we did include that in that description. 46 <br /> 47 <br />Beth Bronson: Thank you very much. I appreciate that. I think I misconstrued my question in that I’m asking the 48 <br />property being dubbed the development. The planned development in these areas that would've affected it. The size 49 <br />of those development areas. 50 <br />29
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.