Browse
Search
7.24.24 BOA Agenda Packet
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Board of Adjustment
>
Agendas
>
2024
>
7.24.24 BOA Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/19/2024 4:59:46 PM
Creation date
7/19/2024 3:59:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
7/24/2024
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
237
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br />Dan Jewell: That's correct. You're referring to, we keep going back to this one. This shows what it is today. 2 <br /> 3 <br />Beth Bronson: Well, it's half of it, it's just that bottom half. And that is only on a single parcel or does that original 25 4 <br />bleed into that secondary parcel, where the mobile home park is. 5 <br /> 6 <br />Dan Jewell: I believe there's been a recombination. 7 <br /> 8 <br />Nathan Robinson: But it's two parcels. 9 <br /> 10 <br />Eric Chupp: It covers portions of two parcels. 11 <br /> 12 <br />Beth Bronson: It covers portions of two parcels. But to be clear, it is still two parcels under consideration that would 13 <br />ultimately need to be combined if a special use permit amendment was granted, right, per this system. 14 <br /> 15 <br />Ben Kuhn: For potential future development. I don't know that it would need to be combined just for purposes of 16 <br />this special use permit. 17 <br /> 18 <br />Beth Bronson: Obviously. But, for the purposes of the intent of design, why the applicant would need to redistribute 19 <br />25 acres because all of these properties still need to be combined into one parcel. 20 <br /> 21 <br />Ben Kuhn: And or subdivided into separate parcels. 22 <br /> 23 <br />Beth Bronson: And or subdivided, should it not be a unitarian ownership. 24 <br /> 25 <br />Leon Meyers: While you're at the podium, Dan referred to dedicating a portion of the 25 acres as a permanent, is it a 26 <br />conservation easement? 27 <br /> 28 <br />Ben Kuhn: Yes. Along the southern boundary line adjacent to Scarlett Mountain Road, because one could argue 29 <br />that if we just redistributed it in some way, somebody could come back here in another 6 months and try to do the same 30 <br />thing. The conservation easement won't allow us to do that. 31 <br /> 32 <br />Leon Meyers: I understand. I don't see that as a condition listed on page 144. Would you be willing to accept that as 33 <br />a condition of the special use permit? 34 <br /> 35 <br />Eric Chupp: That was the intent. 36 <br /> 37 <br />Ben Kuhn: Along the southern boundary closest to Scarlett Mountain Road. 38 <br /> 39 <br />Eric Chupp: The area that's shaded. And just for a little background, when we held the neighborhood information 40 <br />meeting, there was definitely concern about a buffer along Scarlett Mountain Road. This kind of came out of that 41 <br />neighborhood information meeting, dedicating the 100 feet, you know, for the first third of it, and then really a much 42 <br />larger expansion of it for the entire rural buffer area to the western portion of that. And all of that would be placed in a 43 <br />permanent conservation easement. 44 <br /> 45 <br />Leon Meyers: And you're fine with adding that as a condition of the SUP? 46 <br /> 47 <br />Eric Chupp: Absolutely. That was the intent. Thank you. 48 <br /> 49 <br />Leon Meyers: Thank you. Anything else for Mr. Jewell? Thank you, sir. 50 <br />27
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.