7-10-24 PB Agenda Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

9 152 Charity Kirk: I would suggest, it sounds like from my reading of Item 8 is that we are bringing things in line with 153 the state. 154 155 Cy Stober: In part,there are two amendments one will bring our UDO under compliance with the general 156 statute. 157 158 Charity Kirk: So my suggestion is we give each person 6 minutes, 3 minutes on each item because I think Item 159 8 is probably a little less contentious and that will try and keep it shorter, so 6 minutes total, 3 minutes per each item, 160 so if they only want to talk about one item, it's only 3 minutes that they get to talk. 161 162 Lamar Proctor: Well, I do think that the sign-in sheet accurately reflects which item and the name of the person 163 who wants to speak, so given that I think we're all accepting of the fact that this is going to be a multi-session 164 meeting, I think we should just be cognizant of the time and call those up in order in the order in which they signed up 165 and I would ask the public if you feel that your position has been stated, I don't want to cut anyone's time, but if you 166 feel that someone else has said what you wanted to say and it would be duplicative, then you're welcome to just let 167 us know you agree with someone else or I would just ask the public to be mindful of the time.we're not going to cut 168 anybody's time short because this is a public hearing and you all have the right to have your voices heard. So,what 1 169 would propose is that we just follow our normal meeting process and be cognizant of the time and give each 170 individual as they have signed up on the list their 3 minutes. Once the buzzer goes off,we're not trying to be rude, 171 we're just trying to be efficient about time, so when that buzzer goes off the 3 minutes is up, and you'll be asked to 172 step away from the podium to keep things moving forward. There is one additional request that has been made by 173 Preserve Rural Orange which is a community group who has asked for additional time. Before we get into that, does 174 everyone agree as to the process on individual comment on the sign-up sheet,does anyone have any further 175 thoughts. 176 177 Charity Kirk: Suggesting 3 minutes per topic? 178 179 Lamar Proctor: I think the individuals who have signed up have listed their name and the agenda item on which 180 they want to speak,so they should just be called up in order. If a particular individual wants to comment for 3 181 minutes on 7, 8 and 9,well,first we hear the comments on 7,then we'll hear the comments on 8, then we'll hear the 182 comments on 9. 1 don't see any other way to proceed that doesn't get confusing or lead to people feeling that their 183 time has been cut short and that they haven't had the opportunity to address each item as per our explicit rules. 184 185 Charity Kirk; So a 3-minute limit per person to talk about all agenda items. 186 187 Lamar Proctor: Per agenda item,that is our, unless you want to make another motion. 188 189 Charity Kirk: 3 minutes per person per agenda item, so 9 minutes maximum. 190 191 Lamar Proctor: If they signed up for 7,to comment on 7, 8 and 9, and we will do them in the order in which they 192 signed up. 193 194 Charity Kirk: That's fine. 195 196 Lamar Proctor: As per and in sequential order of the agenda items. 197 198 Chris Johnston: I think that makes sense because if we didn't have that we were going to smush them together. 199 200 Lamar Proctor: Right. 201 202 Cy Stober: So to be clear,there will be no deviation from the rules of procedure?