7-10-24 PB Agenda Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

8 102 Lamar Proctor: The meeting process is there's a staff presentation on our items,the applicant presents, then there 103 are questions that will be entertained in sequential order from the Planning Board, and then we take public 104 comments,and then our deliberation and recommendations to the Board of County Commissioners following that 105 process. Since we have consolidated the items,we will, in essence, be discussing all three agenda items at once, so 106 we have to be very careful because, and I want to be clear, Mr. Stober,there's Agenda Item 7 is to review and make 107 recommendations to the BOCC on applicant-initiated amendments to the comprehensive plan to amend the FLUM, 108 the Future Land Use Map to expand a rural neighborhood activity node and to amend the text of Appendix F Land 109 Use and Zoning Matrix. That's the first item. Is that correct? 110 111 Cy Stober: That is correct. 112 113 Lamar Proctor: And so that would be to consider expanding, making conditional zoning that is under consideration 114 in this case applicable to the rural activity node. 115 116 Cy Stober: So the staff presentation will detail our analysis,yes, at present the zoning application is 117 inconsistent with the Future Land Use Map as well as Appendix F, and we have a fairly thorough presentation on our 118 analysis on the existing inconsistency and the applicant's proposed remedy to it. 119 120 Lamar Proctor: Okay, and the Agenda Item No. 8 is review and make recommendation to the BOCC on the 121 applicant-initiated amendments to the UDO pertaining to family care homes. And No. 9 is to review and make 122 recommendations to the BOCC on the zoning atlas amendment to rezone this particular parcel essentially from 123 Agricultural Residential to MPD-CD Master Plan Development Conditional District. 124 125 Cy Stober: That's correct. On Item 8 there's a staff recommendation on this submitted application to resolve 126 some statutory inconsistencies or some inconsistencies of our LIDO with general statute that are independent of the 127 applicant's proposed amendments. 128 129 Chris Johnston: Mr. Chairman, I would request that,you know,just looking at our meeting process,we have the 130 applicant presentation that's going to take place, `we're going to have the questions from the board and the public 131 comments, I would say if we can keep the questions from the board concise and not repeat each other and then for 132 the public comment request that the public listen to what everyone's saying and if someone is about to repeat what 133 'you've already said, in the interests of everyone here, if you have signed up to speak and that item has already been 134 covered, please state that you are reiterating what someone has already said,that will help us understand and gauge 135 where we are that will help move the process along and make sure that everyone can be heard. I would ask that we 136 not necessarily limit people to a lesser amount of time, but as long as we can all understand and work towards that, 1 137 think that'll move this process along. 138 139 Lamar Proctor: Okay,thank you. Any other comments? 140 141 Marilyn Carter: Mr. Chair, I would also recommend following the process that the Board of County Commissioners 142 uses for public comment', I believe it's 1 hours in a given meeting. They typically do it up front at the beginning of 143 their meetings, but we're allowed 1 hour to tonight and if we find that as we may that we're going to reach our 10 p.m. 144 time limit for the meeting that we follow into the next meeting with continued public comment and our deliberations. 145 146 Cy Stober: So, Ms. Carter and the board,that is for general public comments that are addressed to the board 147 on unspecified agenda items or topics. For agenda items, and particularly for those going to public hearing,which 148 this would, there's no limit on the number of comments or the duration of the comment period. 149 150 Marilyn Carter: Okay, in that case, in keeping with the policy then, I would agree. 151