7-10-24 PB Agenda Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

27 1067 otherwise would use for those purposes. Thank you for your time and attention. We'd ask our H41D members who 1068 are in the audience to stand up and show you who we are. 1069 1070 Lamar Proctor: Thank you for that presentation. If it's any consolation to the applicant, this particular board is 1071 very robust in its questioning so I imagine that any information you feel you didn't get an opportunity to present you 1072 will get to explore with this board, so is the board ready to move to the question portion for the applicant? 1073 1074 Chris Johnston: Will we be following our normal procedure going down the line? 1075 1076 Lamar Proctor: Yes.All right, so Statler if you'd like, do you have any questions? 1077 1078 Statler Gilfillen: I do have one, and going through all the information, and I see a lot of good in your proposal, 1079 but the schedule is there,the numbers of units, can you give me some idea of what the estimated budget when this is 1080 completed will be? What is the financial impact in Orange County for this, approximately? 1081 1082 Edwin Cox: I estimated the total budget is between 60 and 75 million for full build out to the 150 units but 1083 it's going to be in phases so that will be comparably less for each phase. 1084 1085 Statler Gilfillen Thank you. 1086 1087 Lamar Proctor: Ms. Carter? 1088 1089 Marilyn Carter: Mr. Chair, I have several questions, so I don't mind deferring to the other end of the table to 1090 come back my way. 1091 1092 Lamar Proctor: Let's stick with the normal protocol, because you may ask questions that others are planning 1093 to ask that will get answered. 1094 1095 Marilyn Carter: Okay,thank you. Well,first off,thank you for the extensive preparation. Your packet, I think it 1096 made for a lot of very good reading for all of us over the last number of days. I really appreciate the time that it takes 1097 to put something like this proposal together and of course the staffs time as well. Because we do look at the 1098 comprehensive plan very closely, I have a question about future land use in the comprehensive plan that I'll ask in a 1099 moment. I did want to, I have several questions, one has to do with a why, in terms of the consideration for the 1100 conservation cluster,and it may be Statler to chime in here, but with respect to the proposal and the MPD-CD 1101 designation,was there a compelling reason why a structure like that,such that was approved recently for the 1102 Stonewall project,which was also a conservation cluster using AR zoning, I believe, is there a compelling reason why 1103 that wasn't pursued in this particular zoning request? 1104 1105 Cy Stober: So, I can speak to our analysis,which is two-fold. One is any subdivision creating more than 1106 20 lots is required to pursue some sort of rezoning. So,the recommendation in the UDO is residential conditional 1107 district; however, master plan development, because it's a large complex subdivision featuring multiple housing 1108 types,the definition of master plan development includes large subdivisions and multi-and mixed-use developments. 1109 The incorporation of the community center and the family care facilities, and my interpretation, and this was,Tom can 1110 attest to, a subject of robust discussion among the staff, my interpretation was the MPD-CD was the most 1111 appropriate zoning district to be applied to what Hands Four was proposing. 1112 1113 Marilyn Carter: Okay,thank you. 1114 1115 Charity Kirk: What were the other options? 1116