7-10-24 PB Agenda Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

14 406 Any other requirements are the requirements for site plan and master plan development submittal,there are no other 407 proposed conditions. The applicant conducted a traffic impact analysis, an environmental site assessment, they've 408 provided analysis on architectural for all non-residential uses and made commitments there, and they've also 409 analyzed the utilities and they have more detail on this, including the proposed wastewater treatment. Those have all 410 been reviewed by the staff on the development advisory committee which includes staff from environmental health; 411 emergency services; solid waste; and department of environment, agriculture, parks, and recreation. The 412 consistency analysis was conducted by staff and I'll note that it was not just current planning and zoning staff, but 413 also our comprehensive and long-range planning and administrative staff, and you'll hear more from Tom Altieri,the 414 senior planner in that division in a moment. And part of the analysis is that family care facilities are not a permitted 415 use in the master plan development conditional district which brings us to Item 8, the proposed text amendments. 416 There are two amendments proposed by the applicant, one is to add family care home as a permitted use in MPD- 417 CD district and the other is to rewrite a footnote in Section 3.8 which is the description of the MPD-CD zoning district 418 that corresponds to the proposed amendments to the comprehensive plan that would allow MPD-CD districts in rural 419 neighborhood activities nodes. There was one amendment proposed by staff that is in the abstract for Item 8 that is 420 to bring our definition for family care home into alignment with that of the state. So just a brief analysis and this really 421 is a reiteration of what's in the abstract, it's fairly straightforward. 160D,which is the land use and development 422 statute, determines what a family care facility is for everyone in the state and the definition is provided here. To be 423 clear, a family care home is deemed a residential use of property for zoning purposes and is a permissible use in all 424 residential districts and we shall not limit that use by making it a special use or requiring a variance to require 425 additional burdens for anyone who wishes to have a family care facility on a residential property. Our definition of 426 master plan development, it references unified large-scale subdivisions which are presumed to be residential in 427 nature, as well as mixed use developments, also presumed to be partially residential in nature. And reviewing that, 428 we've assessed that all 16 conventional zoning districts that permit residential uses and the two conditional districts 429 that support residential uses already allow family care facilities and therefore, it would be appropriate to bring this use 430 as an allowed use into the MPD-CD district. There is an accompanying amendment in the applicant's text 431 amendment application that addresses, again,that footnote in Article 3 for MPD-CD being permitted in the rural 432 neighborhood activity node,and this corresponds to the application for the comprehensive plan amendment to 433 amend Appendix F to allow the same thing. You are permitted to consider the two amendments separately. Are 434 there any questions on that before we move forward? 435 436 Whitney Watson: Yes, I have a question. One of the notes about the MPD-CD,was that there seemed to be an 437 oversight in the matrix,which is one of the suggestions. I was wondering if perhaps the rural community 438 neighborhood, or rural community activity node,was not the actual mistake where it had allowed the master plan 439 development conditional district as opposed to having been omitted from the other. Because it seems to me that in 440 both the community and the neighborhood activity nodes going into this master plan fundamentally changes the 441 character of those activity nodes, at least according to the definitions in both the UDO and the plan, so could you talk 442 a little bit about how those two nodes,activity nodes are different from each other and how they will be, how it might 443 be corrected by adding. 444 445 Cy Stober: Thank you for the segue,that's the very next thing we were going to get to Mr.Watson,thank you. 446 447 Lamar Proctor: All right, good, and I do want to take an aside.This is unrelated to your presentation, but the sign- 448 up sheets, the people who have signed up tonight,that will be the end of the sign-up. If we go into multiple sessions, 449 1 just want to make this clear,there won't be an additional opportunity for more people to sign up. Only those who 450 sign up this evening prior to the public comment period will be permitted to speak. 451 452 Cy Stober: Let me rush those back to the sign-in table so folks can sign in if they want. 453 454 Dolores Bailey: Mr. Chair, does that mean that if they haven't signed up tonight that they will be able to sign up? 455