Browse
Search
5_1_24 Planning Board Minutes
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Minutes
>
2024
>
5_1_24 Planning Board Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/25/2024 11:02:31 AM
Creation date
6/25/2024 11:01:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/1/2024
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
Document Relationships
5-1-24 PB Agenda Packet
(Attachment)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Agendas\2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Approved 6.5.24 <br /> 251 <br /> 252 Taylor Perschau: Okay. I did want to go ahead and acknowledge that we met requirements for public <br /> 253 notification as detailed in the UDO, so notices for this meeting were mailed via First Class Mail to all property <br /> 254 owners within 1,000 feet of the subject parcels on April 19th. Signs were posted on the subject properties April <br /> 255 18th, and ever since we've had application materials ready, we have had them posted publicly on our Active <br /> 256 Development Webpage. Staff analysis is that the application is complete in accordance with Section 2.8 of the <br /> 257 UDO. We also find that the proposal is consistent with goals and objectives outlined within the Orange County <br /> 258 Comprehensive Plan, as was referenced. The Matrix where we're looking at the Future Land Use Classifications <br /> 259 against the zoning does find that GC4 is compatible with the Commercial Industrial Transition in a way that Rural <br /> 260 Residential is actually not. So,the amendment is also found to be reasonable and in the public interest because <br /> 261 it furthers goals of the adopted Comprehensive Plan and is located in an area designated on the Future Land <br /> 262 Use Map as Commercial Industrial Transition Activity Node. Such areas have been identified as areas changing <br /> 263 from rural to urban in form and density, allowing a full range of commercial and industrial uses. So, now that <br /> 264 you've heard from myself and the applicant, now would be time for more review and discussion. I'm available, <br /> 265 Jana and Anthony are available, so back to you. <br /> 266 <br /> 267 Whitney Watson: I know you would like to have a drive through ATM there, and I think the reasons make a lot <br /> 268 of sense. I was curious about what other ATMs are already in the area? I think there's one at Missy's Grill. Is <br /> 269 there any other? <br /> 270 <br /> 271 Anthony Cecil: The only two that we know of are business owned at Missy's Grill, and the other one is at <br /> 272 Efland Supermarket. The closest State Employees would be Churton Grove, and then the next one would be <br /> 273 downtown Mebane near Junction. <br /> 274 <br /> 275 Whitney Watson: Right. Since I know that ATMs can drive business, so customers come there, they get their <br /> 276 cash, then they go in and spend it. What are the business owners of these two other ATMs. Have they had any <br /> 277 comments about the installation of additional ATM in that area? <br /> 278 <br /> 279 Anthony Cecil: I haven't talked to the owner of Missy's. I do know him personally, but I have spoken, not <br /> 280 directly about this subject, with Randy, and I know at Efland Supermarket. I know, the Credit Union had been in <br /> 281 touch with him at one point in time, but I think due to rental or lease agreements, I don't think it ever went through. <br /> 282 <br /> 283 Adam Beeman: All right, thank you. Steve? <br /> 284 <br /> 285 Steve Kaufman: I have no questions. <br /> 286 <br /> 287 Delores Bailey: I do have a question. Back to the ATM, does it cost you all to have the ATM positioned <br /> 288 there? <br /> 289 <br /> 290 Anthony Cecil: No,we do have a lease agreement where I think they were paying us something, $300.00 a <br /> 291 month— <br /> 292 <br /> 293 Delores Bailey: So, you guys might get some money. <br /> 294 <br /> 295 Cecil: Yeah. <br /> 296 <br /> 297 Delores Bailey: Okay, thank you. <br /> 298 <br /> 299 Beth Bronson clarified which parcels were being applied for, so Ms. Perschau discussed the symbology on the <br /> 300 map to identify this. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.