Browse
Search
5_1_24 Planning Board Minutes
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Minutes
>
2024
>
5_1_24 Planning Board Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/25/2024 11:02:31 AM
Creation date
6/25/2024 11:01:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/1/2024
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
Document Relationships
5-1-24 PB Agenda Packet
(Attachment)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Agendas\2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Approved 6.5.24 <br /> 898 Cy Stober: Or both. You could leave it an NR-CD and allow it with development standards in the <br /> 899 industrial zoned districts if that's the pleasure of the Board. <br /> 900 <br /> 901 Lamar Proctor: And it could be subject to use standards in 12, 13. Because of the additional 1,000 foot <br /> 902 restrictions and all that. <br /> 903 <br /> 904 Cy Stober: So, yes, and I would as strongly as I can encourage you to require that, otherwise, I'll have <br /> 905 to make a different recommendation to require the use standards to the Board and I don't want to do that if I don't <br /> 906 have to. <br /> 907 <br /> 908 Beth Bronson: But you're saying use the existing standards that you've put out. Not, I know you're not <br /> 909 saying that, sorry. <br /> 910 <br /> 911 Cy Stober: No, I am, yes. I'm trying to be emphatic as I can, but I serve at your pleasure. Not trying to <br /> 912 tell you what to do, but I really need you to do that, otherwise, I'm going to have to make a different <br /> 913 recommendation. <br /> 914 <br /> 915 Marilyn Carter: And can we ask Lamar to articulate a potential motion to validate it with the Planning <br /> 916 Director? <br /> 917 <br /> 918 Adam Beeman: Well, so before we make a motion, I guess we have to debate it and agree that we want to <br /> 919 put that forward because if it's not going to go anywhere then— <br /> 920 <br /> 921 Charity Kirk: So, the discussion is keeping the proposal, and then also adding it to 12, 13,with the special <br /> 922 — <br /> 923 <br /> 924 Lamar Proctor: Permitted, subject to use standards. <br /> 925 <br /> 926 Charity Kirk: Yes, so that we're giving a little bit more freedom,just a little bit. <br /> 927 <br /> 928 Lamar Proctor: Is that a fair assessment of what— <br /> 929 <br /> 930 Cy Stober: Yeah, and like I said, it matches the original drafted amendment, and after some discussion <br /> 931 we minimized it to just the Conditional District. So it's consistent with what the Attorney's Office and the Planning <br /> 932 staff have already discussed, so you're in line with prior discussions. I'm happy to share that. <br /> 933 <br /> 934 Adam Beeman: I guess the big question is, is there a majority of us that feel like Lamar's motion is worth <br /> 935 discussing any further or approving. <br /> 936 <br /> 937 Marilyn Carter: I'd like to hear it articulated. <br /> 938 <br /> 939 Chairty Kirk: He's not saying to make the motion, Marilyn asked him to make the motion. <br /> 940 <br /> 941 Adam Beeman: So, Lamar's idea, how's that? Is everyone on track with that or— <br /> 942 <br /> 943 Chairty Kirk: I think it's my idea. <br /> 944 <br /> 945 Lamar Proctor: It's her idea. <br /> 946 <br /> 947 Chairty Kirk: My idea. I don't think he's for it, I'm getting that sense. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.