Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-20-2004-5e
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2004
>
Agenda - 04-20-2004
>
Agenda - 04-20-2004-5e
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/2/2008 1:16:33 AM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:40:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/20/2004
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5e
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20040420
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Orange County, NC <br />Change Order #Z -Addition of Viper to Study <br />19 Februa~2004 <br />To: Craig Blackwood <br />Orange County, NC <br />Subject: Request for Authorization for Additional Services, and Change Order #2 to <br />Phase 2A of Orange County Contract Dated 1 December 2001 <br />Commission # 20045A <br />CTA Communications requests an Authorization for Additional Services for additional work <br />for the following purposes: <br />A. Adding an analysis of North Cazolina Viper system to Long Term Report. <br />B. Providing a Funding White Paper. <br />1,0 General Requirements: <br />A. CTA will include in the Long Term Report, an analysis of the alternative of <br />contracting with the State of North Carolina to join their Statewide 800 MHz <br />Radio Trunking Network "Viper" as opposed to the County of Orange purchasing <br />a County owned 800 MHz Radio Trunking system. <br />B. CTA will provide a White Paper on funding options to be used by the various <br />Jurisdictions to present a common goal for Grants and funding assistance. <br />2,0 Additional Conditions with regazd to Change Order #2: <br />A. The analysis would include a technical description of the "Viper" system and how <br />it would be built out to service the County, an analysis of the coverage and <br />capacity of the Viper system, and the costs associated with joining the Network. <br />It would include a comparison of the costs, both short term and long term, <br />between the private solution and the Viper solution, It will include pros and cons <br />of each solution in terms of Functionality, coverage, capacity, and reliability. It <br />will also show potential migration paths to Viper and the private solution as <br />funding becomes available. <br />B. The White Paper will be drafted based upon inputs from the County and <br />considering our recommended migration paths, A braft will be sent to the County <br />for' review. Up to 12 copies of the Final will be supplied to the County. <br /> <br />~ ~~ ~ Page 1 of 3 <br />COMMLINICAilONS <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.